IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 26 April 2024 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674CBC14CE24 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lpwy1q_Iooep for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEECEC14F726 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VR6Jv4hq8z6H4BH; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1714169231; bh=cuTvuUUV8m8KcsF4Wv/i9TGLjeQzTtS+RiA92ULdsmk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=nN7SU5MlxMChnU/ohie+u7HZLTLcIFwsc+pOCDCeJGGZf/0eWSkgfaIMlSw/meFOt TevJ9j4FloinXJxNc1Z5rJICzEOfXoe1OJj41B1545pbzvbkBOKkBjRvMiFkVw41VB QdIiTnE32Dj2uZKs3qwJozQowY20r98O8nNjH2cM=
X-Quarantine-ID: <y-eOkUeJhpDi>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.1] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VR6Jv01ryz6H3KG; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <895d9394-e334-45e8-b4c7-35a8c8c9448f@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:07:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <77834c57-25e9-4233-8184-e04e926b8895@joelhalpern.com> <2BEF3092-771C-4D5A-8EA5-34C607ABB4D7@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <2BEF3092-771C-4D5A-8EA5-34C607ABB4D7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/EAgdNIR8pkP5sDyzN1zoKPbcwsI>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:07:16 -0000

It's up to Luigi and Padma, but my read is that if it was private it was 
not a WG decision.

Yours,

Joel

On 4/26/2024 6:05 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> Can you find an on-list email where such a conclusion was reached.  That would certainly explain your choice.
> I searched (before I sent the last email) and could not find anything. Likely it was private.
>
> Dino

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status