IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Fri, 14 November 2014 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05991A6F3F for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:16:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.144
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJkza6urgMAA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:16:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76AA1A0358 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,383,1413237600"; d="scan'208";a="106763823"
Received: from dhcp-9be1.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.155.225]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 14 Nov 2014 06:16:35 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <1b7f4cc2835d4a7294100dcdea921eb1@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:16:33 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A7A6DC9-9961-48E2-AFC1-FAD3A4D20DD2@inria.fr>
References: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net> <1b7f4cc2835d4a7294100dcdea921eb1@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ESh6G-DSdqlMOYlb7mstigfHoJg
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:16:42 -0000

Hello

On 13 Nov 2014, at 19:07, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:

> This (both -07 and -08) is much improved from the previous versions.  I just have two questions regarding what is not there.
>  
> Previous versions of the LISP introduction had a section on "xTR Mapping Cache Performance". This section (in the older documents) was largely based on studies that made unrealistic assumptions about the granularity of the mapping table entries. Thus it seems reasonable to have dropped the section. However, with a cache based system, isn’t cache performance in fact quite important? Is this something that would go into a different document, and if so which one?

We decide to put all the “subjective” parts in impact document.  By subjective I
mean the things that are not directly related to the protocol but more to how
it is used.  Impact is in the charter so we see intro as a description of the
protocol and impact as what could happen if LISP were used.
>  
> Also, I didn’t see a discussion of OAM. This also seems like something that is quite important. Is this again something that would go into a different document?
>  

Impact. We would be more than happy to have feedback from people 
about the different impact but what we are looking is impact based on
facts, not expectations. 

Damien Saucez 

> Thanks, Ross
>  
> From: lisp [mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Iannone
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 8:04 AM
> To: LISP mailing list list
> Cc: Damien Saucez
> Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
>  
> All,
> 
> A lot of work has been done lately on draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 and the authors requested a work group last call.
> 
> This email starts a WG last call, to end November 14th, 2014.
> 
> You will find the document here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07
>  
> Please review this WG document.  Let the working group know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it. 
> If you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and if possible suggest text to resolve them.
> 
> Joel & Luigi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email