Re: [lisp] Outstanding WG Calls

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com> Tue, 16 December 2014 08:58 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6E11A6FC0 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGRtjSb-KyeM for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627ED1ACD42 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h11so11508244wiw.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mYVzJ8gM92XXVRIfRpQ4VuKg3LTbgQ9A30f4Y9/1jtQ=; b=KUL1mzjzXehEnm7251x+7JIyW3X9YdZOYzxTUPgoNNTzOnQ7ckf/DwW1mz6FhWcoDR 3IMPZoIuCIE4vsl4bxCNE3w8QwkC4UM4z6/25G9F+GQ+oZuuYw/kwugcLtuKwpc85B/b XC9dNO0b9ijE7MNDHOlbiRtcvDLFxbNDfzfRjuoCxxSGH78x8Q7PPRxNCiG0UEtNthoL 3pf1nc6fLCiiaRV5NmXdUE1COkwN7pvqk5cFbSAHXtY4cj1ZK5Qe9TwGtnRffBSdkVBo zKpAqnOHTfA1mUOXGQ1IJ/j5sAyAPWSM27MLBQNZFEu6gBdL//xwbng6iCERT8xv35D/ lASA==
X-Received: by 10.180.93.37 with SMTP id cr5mr2851530wib.76.1418720309712; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from saehrimnir.inria.fr (saehrimnir.inria.fr. [138.96.206.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ce1sm308800wjc.2.2014.12.16.00.58.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:58:29 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B2741308-3189-4854-96E2-A4124DC6FD5A@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:58:28 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5B9A5920-C170-4D5A-866A-6610CE2ADA9C@gmail.com>
References: <D35D7CD0-20E5-4210-8025-7C92441DD339@gigix.net> <9D9C61E3-F28D-4AD9-8906-998694C6A1E4@gigix.net> <B2741308-3189-4854-96E2-A4124DC6FD5A@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Em_HbD08EFJddYU-8tHBcJXcoWc
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Outstanding WG Calls
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 08:58:34 -0000

Thank you, we will had this to the new version. Florin is already on the beef :)

Damien Saucez

On 16 Dec 2014, at 00:21, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Beside the crypto document there is a call for adoption for the impact document and a WG last call for the EID block management guidelines.
> 
> I just went through draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.txt. Section 3 has some really good research and is explained well to understand the conclusion of the research. I applaud the authors for that.
> 
> A comment or request for a reference, since you are talking about multicast replication engineering here you may want to add lisp-te as a reference here:
> 
>>   Even though it is its main goal, LISP is more than just a scalability
>>   solution, it is also a tool to provide both incoming and outgoing
>>   traffic engineering [S11], can be used as an IPv6 transition at the
>>   routing level, and for inter-domain multicast [RFC6831],
>>   [I-D.coras-lisp-re]. 
> 
> You should also add to this:
> 
>> [I-D.coras-lisp-re] and [CDM12] propose a technique to construct xTR
>>   based inter-domain multicast distribution trees.
> 
> That there are signaling approaches like you indicated in RFC6831 as well as using LISP to signal in a reference to lisp-mr-signalling as well as using a signal-free approach as in lisp-signal-free-multicast. Those references would prove useful to readers.
> 
> Other than that, this is a really well written document and ready for next step IMO.
> 
> Dino
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp