IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub

Sharon <sbarkai@gmail.com> Wed, 13 January 2021 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sbarkai@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83883A10CB; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WvuhP7tilWvB; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 383F83A10C1; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id w1so1807320ejf.11; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=FVXAe8t9k5hAJ4aezzG2nCCJ78PQ/l/Wt5J/UHIqRAA=; b=YUDAnZ3lPj26TUwwDt22VfdNu0Tk+JqJlCwDSWKLpMBQ4j4E0WGD+H2KFbOI4yXtB9 uvemR1HhrtVi88PCAguRq/b7pDtV1mEAyEXLax9D1oPmkm4/3SdWmtxt81AR7uJJ9qVe WT2j/vZDXTZ5cgAM9zTvWL+QmnjELUlIWWtnMkfmcUqyYTF5anCeKXfYYVbdOGdHipmm t5XkHY3M7TC7fVXFY3M1pwYFiQSSqG973MCjryldrZPCOgafjpaGM34Afej7P/UxRcve zEkOXs3H+4NOP/OK2dJUyWkZG9xIZbnmgEzU1VoK+3WYrwBdyqcZRFg1rPbXm5Tx823h nKtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=FVXAe8t9k5hAJ4aezzG2nCCJ78PQ/l/Wt5J/UHIqRAA=; b=GZ5sxoHxFL2kO2zWJZUEnmxvrTzHhfmZ2+PBBVnE4Rc1MwJ6oKKHLKeBXLnivBcDy8 VN7BeBnbdmLgHA6eCmgjLZ1HTD6Op2g9UVYzj7VRkhyDXaAkFWPutLz9rKHSO1x3FQ8C SsbF/gKN69PwCbd2m+kvMFCAF1/BreOnKj0NDVwXe6nsTApW22DsZQHxD1frUPlOc0bX d91dWX0hY7DFeMak232ZeVxyTRbjdnrmfj1VjPz6Q7I80+4Dfn4Dcg6JY4+myy4f6+jR SsTEgwRZSatDkWceLeLO+/VSJ0qpUCc3iJfwbYbUTb/47rLlASY08lUpqH10bifs6LCq dBGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XLL7XllZxfIKxZZrZkvqR2dLKVZUyHBFQAlqSU3yl9XxFWElG KBqiiNdbgtodsCO5yIqNmw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzZcw8OFL0NGbdEZNjwjmXwddRJWXIWSuVExgkp/G3MXsRAq8K9k/+gVMk3XtBgp7mMFuq0w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:adce:: with SMTP id lb14mr737779ejb.81.1610526706551; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4df4:10d:5600:6cd2:5f16:e103:7910? ([2001:4df4:10d:5600:6cd2:5f16:e103:7910]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bm12sm406377ejb.117.2021.01.13.00.31.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-773DB9B5-82DC-4B2B-989E-6079B81F9EAE"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Sharon <sbarkai@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1C7BD0C-30C6-4A14-82D4-FB7748F70EE5@gigix.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:31:45 +0200
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <073EE6CD-0FF3-467C-A991-77C206446CC2@gmail.com>
References: <D1C7BD0C-30C6-4A14-82D4-FB7748F70EE5@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18C66)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/FIybMS7mkL-ODeZLDYSOCBTzgUk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:31:50 -0000

Support!

I think LISP as shown you can build overlays without resorting to circuit-switched controllers by using the mapping system. This mechanism makes the mapping effect quicker to respond to changes by adding pub-sub proven scalability.

--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794

> On Jan 13, 2021, at 09:20, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The authors of  draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub submitted a new version addressing the issues raised during SECDIR review.
> The document seems mature and stable and authors are asking for formal WG Last Call.
> 
> This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end January 28th, 2021.
> 
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready to be handed over to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> NOTE: silence IS NOT consensus!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email