IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57EBB1A88FF for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQSGm0Roox4P for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF7E1A893F for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qcmi9 with SMTP id i9so18975731qcm.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=taISwQvjnzLMjCzlO8kEyS9AwIWoigQFerHSVuEzeqA=; b=I57VtQ39zOYk31IOYK/VOyRwv6YCGKkkAWtkIz8INOU5G+U+2bMF3SYk0KKv9j/hOG m4KL7lF75HGIElHyPUjGDVscAaQXKkUhrBb/nkBR6oIIJpShyauK/hX5v+X0Hj1yU6Ts 8YdmKVghvkB06zWXw8f8pSvK9gUyUEOuSqAClV9cgXTAzrW6MGRjjAWQkm/VDW06xbod uLchBA83+A4T8SDhyuVOvnnmA9MlRRCKaSJC3gB0dVBWTLo/pJKCUlOVvJoQlmacDWlb VwcjFLqrjxIBByzi/IZkFsfyiWoB6EM5N5gXnuRvUJ3xitjcHm5OD0GpjwwfrAWX2sT8 Icag==
X-Received: by 10.140.46.75 with SMTP id j69mr42723586qga.17.1433431193682; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.195.220.118] ([166.170.36.86]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f192sm2498429qhc.37.2015.06.04.08.19.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12F70)
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0501MB14307EBCD2711B365EAAD618A5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:19:50 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DFDEF8F7-B2D4-4F47-9FC1-FE56AED003F7@gmail.com>
References: <96CCC975-4D04-46F4-ABA9-D5BF6A77C451@gigix.net> <1F6A3E9B-62E7-4B5D-99F3-2DE6AC0FB13F@gigix.net> <BY1PR0501MB14301C95C338B693B870DCEBA5B60@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <199AEC90-B132-4493-BB7D-E3088093F222@gigix.net> <BY1PR0501MB143061359489A70478CFC14FA5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <82E787F8-1BD1-4F2F-A286-227873019288@gmail.com> <1D2F1DE4-A8F4-4998-8BBE-7307AAD1467D@gigix.net> <54754D2F-C2F6-4CA3-BC61-EE0F8A8CF446@gmail.com> <BY1PR0501MB14307EBCD2711B365EAAD618A5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/FPutsvx7GXw-BoyUi6HnBHpWZvc>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:20:03 -0000


> On Jun 4, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Thus it seems fine to me to replace “OAM” with “RLOC reachability” in the proposed text.

As written it is a noun. I indicated "RLOC reachability mechanisms". 

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email