IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02

Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> Thu, 29 January 2015 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lori@lispmob.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3BA1A0193 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F80phpUqWP8W for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.edu [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CD21A0151 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw-2.ac.upc.es (gw-2.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.8]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0TAC9Ft005062; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:12:09 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [89.123.99.190]) by gw-2.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BF7CC0; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:12:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54CA0777.6040200@lispmob.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:12:07 +0200
From: Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org>
Organization: LISPmob
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com>, lisp@ietf.org
References: <270570EF-D42E-41DA-8848-1510A2E32D27@gmail.com> <54C2CD91.50906@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54C2CD91.50906@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Fl1K-B2zhKqt0FCyIPGL4pPFc8o>
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:12:17 -0000

On 01/24/2015 12:39 AM, Fabio Maino wrote:
> Agree. It was recently refreshed from expiration, and I believe it's
> ready for last call.

+1

There are several implementations, that have been thoroughly tested for
interoperability, so I support this document going into working group
last call.

-Lori

> 
> Fabio
> 
> On 1/23/15 9:25 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> I would like to ask the working group if there are any issues with
>> draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02 and if there is any reason to not send this
>> document for working group last call?
>>
>> It has been around for a while, has good implementation and deployment
>> support and hasn't been presented in a working group meeting for a while.
>>
>> Dino
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email