Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Hi!

I know everyone has been busy working on the base specifications — thanks
for that!

However, it has been a while and I haven’t seen any movement on this
document.  Including deployment experience and the discussion about the
change of status.

What’s the plan to move this forward?

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On April 26, 2022 at 9:37:07 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) (
[e-mail]) wrote:

Sounds good Alvaro. We’re already collecting some deployment experience as
per the chairs suggestion. We’ll send an updated draft to the list once
ready.



Thanks!

Aberto



*From: *Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>
*Date: *Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:22 PM
*To: *Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
*Cc: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Luigi Iannone <[e-mail]>,
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
*Subject: *Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09

Alberto:



Hi!



I don’t have an objection with changing the status.  However, I would be
interested in any deployment experience.



In any case, please make sure that a change is discussed on the mailing
list — start a new thread so it doesn’t end up buried in this one.



Thanks!



Alvaro.



On April 26, 2022 at 6:02:23 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) (
[e-mail]) wrote:

One quick reply regarding the intended status. As discussed in Vienna, it
seems that this one could be moved into Standards Track. The plan for the
next iteration is to update the intended status to Proposed Standard.