[lisp] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19

Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Tue, 25 September 2018 09:26 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153786758036.30012.5926379631854398353@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:26:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/FvxScE5UCk4GucX2ihV5uxPMEMQ>
Subject: [lisp] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19

Reviewer: Brian Trammell
Review result: Ready with Nits

Thanks for the revisions. Following up on my previous tsvart review, there is
one remaining nit from previous transport reviews:

- Section 5.3, the list "When doing ITR/PITR encapsulation", third item needs a
citation fix:

OLD:

      The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
      of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
      order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC3168].

NEW:

     The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7
      of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in
      order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC6040].

Thanks, cheers,

Brian

[lisp] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-… Brian Trammell
Re: [lisp] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-l… Dino Farinacci