[lisp] Jari Arkko's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with BLOCK)
"Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 03 February 2016 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EF81B36F4; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:50:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160203235002.11194.20571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:50:02 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/G3dDULGJsJj9tJlIM3OWJLvE2XA>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Jari Arkko's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:50:03 -0000
Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: Block When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for formulating a proposal for LISP work to continue to next step(s). The results will be interesting, and there's a group of people interested in doing the work. The basics of the proposed charter seem good; learn from the experience and take what worked well into PS, ditch the not-so-well-worked parts, and continue some part of the work as experimental until we have more experience of it. I will support a new charter for the working group, but first I have a question that I want discuss. I do think though that we should talk about the scoping of the charter. It is quite imprecise with respect to what will be on standards track and what is not. Could that or the process leading to that decision be clarified? Or am I missing something on this late hour when I read the charter? For instance, consider taking to PS things that we have published as RFCs before (possibly modified).
- [lisp] Jari Arkko's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-03… Jari Arkko
- Re: [lisp] Jari Arkko's Block on charter-ietf-lis… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Jari Arkko's Block on charter-ietf-lis… Jari Arkko