[lisp] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: (with COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work on this document!

I have some relatively minor comments/nits:

(1) §18: s/RFC8060/RFC8061

(2) §1: "Finally, [I-D.ietf-lisp-introduction] describes the LISP
architecture."  First of all, it would seem to me that the Architecture should
be a Normative reference...but I-D.ietf-lisp-introduction says that it "is used
for introductory purposes, more details can be found in RFC6830, the protocol
specification."  This document obsoletes rfc6830...so it seems to me that there
is a failed circular dependency.

(3) References to rfc2119/rfc8174 and rfc8126 should be Normative.