Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

"Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com> Mon, 29 December 2014 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <darlewis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248A91A90FE for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:25:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XqUveOpVR_fi for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F36C1A908B for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:25:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3132; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1419888331; x=1421097931; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zShqjSx3OuGO3WxYiPKfJLh9YxArmHrWJZNL1U1WuuM=; b=aFRncuz3BtyCgt3iOKBn5WBdYoiTkudmZ/UAFqTjfHRHtBOFI7OK/HzR KbZv8bJDGGsnmknY5Oz3a7qKymkxBJp+H+EelnTPP7wZoAii0J5jSM8i2 MjVZTHs21huNudLHpoZKTVQ3Dza8sIXQkHoHcrViwY3c8Yv/vNgugHIyd 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkQFAILGoVStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABcgwZSWATGYgqFeAKBDRYBAQEBAX2EDAEBAQMBAQEBGlELBQsCAQgYJwcnCxQRAgQOBYgkCA3CXAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARMEj0QzB4MWgRMFjhWDP4U0gQ2CZYolgzkig25vgUV+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,661,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="383272960"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2014 21:25:11 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBTLPATl020811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:25:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.86]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:25:10 -0600
From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
Thread-Index: AQHQI63s9/M7YXR50kizcwbn42Weeg==
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:25:09 +0000
Message-ID: <180E6B00-C9A8-44F1-A2F2-F3A6A02D3CD9@cisco.com>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net> <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.253.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <DB089FB236331E418ADBD6DE5279E20D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/HvTTts2Dq7Kq7vjcEGzXf-pAcPQ
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:25:33 -0000

I support option #1.

-D
On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to address the milestone.
> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to address the milestone.
> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to do this.
> 
> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what "different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us understand your opposition.
> If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.
> 
> Speak up, please.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>>  for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>> 
>> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>> 
>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>> 
>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
>> description of the impacts of LISP”.
>> 
>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
>> January 2015).
>> 
>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Luigi & Joel
>> 
>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>>> adoption.
>>> 
>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>>> meeting outcome.
>>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>> 
>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>>> approval or disapproval.
>>> 
>>> Recall that:
>>> 
>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>>> expected to
>>>  modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>>> content is solid.
>>>  Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>>> changes to its content.
>>> 
>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>>> your reasons why,
>>>  and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>> 
>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>>> and we can
>>>  begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>> Luigi and Joel
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp