Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 03 November 2013 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03F821F9B9F for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:35:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXqfeI9Dvdj0 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2588F11E8205 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5B846; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:35:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lGldJn75LMna; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:35:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macpro.10ww.steffann.nl (macpro.10ww.steffann.nl [37.77.56.75]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FCFC3D; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:35:31 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <82F5CF42-2E3A-444A-8449-39B01C0B2C3B@gigix.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 23:35:32 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3C9E1CFD-642E-4590-92BB-E1E5F65F8B02@steffann.nl>
References: <20131030154454.587D918C143@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <15CC7F54-075E-4EB8-940B-8DCB198134A2@apnic.net> <E6AD700C-DC48-48DB-9FF5-A24C6121834C@gmail.com> <D68CD130-50BC-42AE-95E5-A4EBEEB20808@apnic.net> <8119249a5b4cb0604726fa7560538cf3@bartschnet.de> <FBB83D5B-E5C1-493E-8FAD-2AF489759CBF@steffann.nl> <82F5CF42-2E3A-444A-8449-39B01C0B2C3B@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:35:37 -0000

Hi,

> you are right. But IMHO this is one possible economic model.
> 
> What about third parties selling MR/MS services which include also PxTRs services?

That is exactly what I am doing (oh, well, no real customers yet, but working on that :-). For the PxTR services such a third party would then only announce the block(s) used by his own customers though. Providing free transit for the whole EID block would get kind of expensive if LISP takes off...

Cheers!
Sander