Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
"Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com> Mon, 22 December 2014 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <vimoreno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFD81AC39B for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:43:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V2WP2txeDt0m for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0531AC39A for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:43:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3487; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1419270213; x=1420479813; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hPMnrnToPcL0OU94MIPPXmvOV1qsT99t/VZnVt5Z/+M=; b=Q8nwjgjXwh/Aw9fNiFxyQY2YP6PcyIH5/j1ZEiD+zUOBZXCH/NRf9hEM stdbbct8TLxt7hsHZL9TLVo7VSbD7n7YhG6uR615mrDFwarOV3IH0bc9b 7YtgqEggK4/6Yk3UzNxZ2fSrMQ0M+jA4Dkc2fUu4FqxTXfgiq3ESf8x2A 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmgFAPhXmFStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABbgwZSWMY/CoVwAoEaFgEBAQEBfYQMAQEBAwEBAQEaUQsFCwIBCBgnByEGCxQRAgQOBYgYAwkIDcpaDYU/AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSNSoF1MweDFoETBY4Rgz6DcIFEgQ2CZIgFghyDOSKDbm+CQwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,625,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="382310041"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2014 17:43:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBMHhTOp027673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:43:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.252]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:43:29 -0600
From: "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
Thread-Index: AQHQHgeH7IW0E19ENUyvFSvTOAfjzJyb4Yaj
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:43:27 +0000
Message-ID: <BEE5EEF1-600C-4836-AD9C-BD552D2274C6@cisco.com>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net> <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>, <13346F57-8C24-4455-8501-EEE7DFD86AFB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <13346F57-8C24-4455-8501-EEE7DFD86AFB@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/JDA2eOCeSxJMVt6CT2_9j_SPu30
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:43:35 -0000
+ 1 Victor > On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like option (1) and think the document should be adopted. > > Dino > >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: >> >> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices: >> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to address the milestone. >> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to address the milestone. >> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to do this. >> >> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted. >> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what "different" looks like. Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us understand your opposition. >> If you like (3), please explain. That path seems likely to waste more time than producing a good document. Particularly since we have what looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable. >> >> Speak up, please. >> >> Yours, >> Joel >> >>> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call >>> for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07. >>> >>> There was actually very little reaction on this call. >>> >>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another. >>> >>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A >>> description of the impacts of LISP”. >>> >>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th >>> January 2015). >>> >>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Luigi & Joel >>> >>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net >>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 >>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07] >>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on >>>> adoption. >>>> >>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the >>>> meeting outcome. >>>> The call ends on December 19th 2014. >>>> >>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of >>>> approval or disapproval. >>>> >>>> Recall that: >>>> >>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is >>>> expected to >>>> modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the >>>> content is solid. >>>> Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see >>>> changes to its content. >>>> >>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state >>>> your reasons why, >>>> and explain what it would take to address your concerns. >>>> >>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues >>>> and we can >>>> begin a dialog about how best to address them. >>>> Luigi and Joel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> lisp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
- [lisp] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG … Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - C… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Chad Hintz (chahintz)
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Sharon Barkai
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Darrel Lewis (darlewis)
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07… Luigi Iannone