Re: [lisp] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Tue, 28 August 2018 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE24C124C04; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_YvLDgdDaYx; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668F4130DD8; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id p12-v6so953761pfh.2; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KLqRxBqNQKW+JR4G77cwQHXEORgk7UOqVvkaCvVrdxM=; b=XgwZBS5gcolnrwECtl+SfUYUmYfHosEKuYDfWqcvTPXForWDN7tE7rElUQ6Sj7Lus2 yKQDISGH1HJAdmSQro4QP1vQhr3QxPwkFa0sCf6yBSOF8OiHlN1URYAYtdEavAajKK1E 78+Rg7KVQGRC/qo60+AE4nXON+HyF4hRMzr3YtGAGzowr0MNMu4VITSgfUuhTShprASz I2efcWv2HRwDofpAdCf9wFGSYQ+JrmHtXGfVAPjj96xwUDpk38Lz4HXHDsd5w8gNuyqD J/uAkrBXa0VJQ3v/ykjaxS9/U01J48mSbcpSj95YP12pnMI9zTSgqhkhxTpcAYmwMX7n pvrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KLqRxBqNQKW+JR4G77cwQHXEORgk7UOqVvkaCvVrdxM=; b=nQYXiuHm5B/C0nyXe8eeT7SfFafTDV00MxrljAka+BukGsPV+L5JGXVjRc5iWlDMtE ZGMhZXbAzK+ESM+yK92oWteQBcf7yekLeh/woqftUHJmqdlzIqqZDHSfEY1I6O0lphWX EA7UtCC3QpMZ7gMz5rz3b0Y0NUJTWchsm7qC53o1RanDdCvr9x2C3C2XaUIYK7qB7Bej HLS6CHeabn2pwc7m+EQY2jm+V+CcMWjvf2AoRFIhnIVLOURBOKkEo9eAodP3HZKtEHn1 rBk3CKbt22WLM/whLGuMOXCHxMa3k2auYI/6+hJ2Q9Z2RpDmRbCq9C/Isxt7G19RCOuL ORjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DnA7JL9aLNh49c4u3SFp0QxjijBQ3UDvCXGvWAGPjS/8WOGvTQ vfJ1OxfBlKqsXZgOVWHzNPc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZZ0KYHyFvBZTrH9O59+MkNAJFVocCJTTJNs8wI2LA2QadTQ+dEttbvaJbpNH0B7Tm+331TgA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5706:: with SMTP id l6-v6mr2317322pgb.118.1535473566971; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.79.28] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n80-v6sm3221987pfb.95.2018.08.28.09.26.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <153546084779.23731.3772960451880909496@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 09:26:05 -0700
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis.all@ietf.org, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5A9D2E1-915A-4B38-BD1B-BF26ADBDE40F@gmail.com>
References: <153546084779.23731.3772960451880909496@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/JUDNjrWPMucWmL_o1DCNl5sIOac>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 16:26:09 -0000

Thanks a ton Scott. Hope you are enjoying your retirement.  ;-)

Dino

> On Aug 28, 2018, at 5:54 AM, Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Scott Bradner
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I performed an OPS-DIR review of The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
> (draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16) This ID is the result of a bifurcation of RFC
> 6830 as such review of the basic technology is OBE. (i.e. RFC 6830 was
> published years ago – any deep technology review should have been done then.)
> The ID does make some changes to the technology described in RFC 6830 but the
> changes do not present any operations related issues that I can see.
> 
> The version I was asked to review did not have a “Changes since RFC 6830”
> section (as all RFCs that update or obsolete other RFCs should have) but that
> has been fixed so I have no additional issues.
> 
>