IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711A7129284; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:29:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1FwHjj1iL0I; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:29:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE981271FF; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:29:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2127; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549556987; x=1550766587; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=NxsyyW80HLrx80OykV0pqxdEXajI2qDl/G7c/gjDWtY=; b=BYY0jt/PlHzsSOhU+MyGLBjRU1DZbKbPkPCetPfoUE4+x2CTTyvlVFlI HXcx3jjv8Jwnb1IW32tCcv0EaeDrwCwrUGUT89Mi7ja2CBUmi/D+ZzWDC 1TAvce8lCyfbAsIcAGT1HFMflq2plkhZfcJP2kcx7P4bVF1RiJgzLdARu g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAAAlXFxc/xbLJq1kDgwBAQEBAQIBAQEBBwIBAQEBgVQCAQEBAQsBgzsyJ4QDiHmMeCV8mRAIAwEBhGwCg0o3Bg0BAwEBAgEBAm0ohUoBAQEDASNWBQsLGCoCAlcGE4MkAYF5CK0ogS+FRIRXD4JtiW2Bf4ERJwwTghc1iAoxgiYCiX+HAZIQCYRGjX8ZikqIC5kSgmoCBAYFAhSBXCJCgRQzGggbFWUBgkE+gWoXE41QPD4DMI56AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.58,344,1544486400"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="9881259"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2019 16:29:45 +0000
Received: from [10.61.203.34] ([10.61.203.34]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x17GTh2e014796 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 16:29:44 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <D427FD6F-1F0D-4009-844A-EFE7DA66FD4F@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D379585D-F0B5-4989-97D2-79DF056918CE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 17:29:42 +0100
In-Reply-To: <154955015018.31108.12820143983477326611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <154955015018.31108.12820143983477326611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.203.34, [10.61.203.34]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Jh7zo8tVB81qjC1gdNQw-cKvSv8>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-26: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:29:50 -0000

Just on this point:

> On 7 Feb 2019, at 15:35, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Section 3 still contains text:
> 
>   EID-to-RLOC Database:   The EID-to-RLOC Database is a global
>      distributed database that contains all known EID-Prefix-to-RLOC
> 
> that indicates that the mapping database is a single, global, distributed
> database; we had previously agreed that the target scope was much more
> narrow.  I could perhaps charitably assume that this instance was missed as an
> editing error because the phrase "global distributed database" spans a line
> break, but given that this specific instance was called out in my previous
> discuss position, it is fairly hard to do so.

Funnily enough, I didn’t envision in LISP-NERD that there would be just one.  But it seems that this definition is the only reference to the term in the document.  Probably safe to remove, unless it is normatively referenced elsewhere?

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email