IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 04 June 2015 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2F41A8A4E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SG7d6v81IbeA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41F71A8A08 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so129126746wib.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=MkQA0BUZZa8UNZgFM6Y4mgOPyt8w+VPpFQCbpzdQxjo=; b=M6gC9LWS3SJYCrlfCCoq7Bp6CWKdlePu3KKZ52uk7Oi01lQhYYKbr1N8yD8AIMrVcO tQTJzk+hO0L6UgI/pJf0rjcxwZeqwG10/TPjvRUMf8e7HzsHlmA2LCE0WY+RZ3/+WkMQ cJb55HDUEmPlT4RnJqjWlRKcWnpOagtpxnaervlK7dLioljXUqnHRODrHpNlCLb3wfJz tISe3Dl4IPS3hjklYiwomZ+fsImKVs7dv3GXtk5U6XX85Hnr09gKFuzQbwRSbC5PX8zW zmlpMn3STC3qg8wjuHM9khvNBXgNInIGlY1USeMgKjzS3j/Gb4Ac/c3nrXrb/FEqlsOk 2Z8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXYdiNnTIxssDHfKPOPZrW52oCZjJzpETyQeeLRTYXxEzAIUg4Q6ahVuq57VgVnHj2WPk7
X-Received: by 10.180.106.73 with SMTP id gs9mr8834885wib.1.1433432437620; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:f44e:fd93:19fe:c165? ([2001:660:330f:a4:f44e:fd93:19fe:c165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y19sm6870611wia.15.2015.06.04.08.40.36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <BY1PR0501MB14302B111DC1565340BFDA56A5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:40:41 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4434BB0C-FFB3-44D2-8BD2-AF7D78F3DE9C@gigix.net>
References: <96CCC975-4D04-46F4-ABA9-D5BF6A77C451@gigix.net> <1F6A3E9B-62E7-4B5D-99F3-2DE6AC0FB13F@gigix.net> <BY1PR0501MB14301C95C338B693B870DCEBA5B60@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <199AEC90-B132-4493-BB7D-E3088093F222@gigix.net> <BY1PR0501MB143061359489A70478CFC14FA5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <82E787F8-1BD1-4F2F-A286-227873019288@gmail.com> <1D2F1DE4-A8F4-4998-8BBE-7307AAD1467D@gigix.net> <54754D2F-C2F6-4CA3-BC61-EE0F8A8CF446@gmail.com> <BY1PR0501MB14307EBCD2711B365EAAD618A5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DFDEF8F7-B2D4-4F47-9FC1-FE56AED003F7@gmail.com> <BY1PR0501MB14302B111DC1565340BFDA56A5B30@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/KDq364eJ5ZvQANdXnFoE1HD7-sk>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:40:40 -0000

Excellent.

We will use “RLOC reachability mechanisms”

Thanks.

ciao

L.


> On 04 Jun 2015, at 17:22, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Yup. "RLOC reachability mechanisms" sounds like the right term in this case. 
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farinacci@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:20 AM
> To: Ross Callon
> Cc: Luigi Iannone; LISP mailing list list
> Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-02
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jun 4, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Thus it seems fine to me to replace “OAM” with “RLOC reachability” in the proposed text.
> 
> As written it is a noun. I indicated "RLOC reachability mechanisms". 
> 
> Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email