Re: [lisp] lisp-subscribe for multicast (S,G) entries

"Barkai, Sharon" <sharon.barkai@hp.com> Wed, 12 August 2015 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sharon.barkai@hp.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FC41ACDD4 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ly9RSxC0_oGN for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g1t5425.austin.hp.com (g1t5425.austin.hp.com [15.216.225.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA56C1ACDD3 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G2W4316.americas.hpqcorp.net (g2w4316.austin.hp.com [16.197.9.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g1t5425.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C8E336; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:55:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G1W5782.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.193.26.0) by G2W4316.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.197.9.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:54:08 +0000
Received: from G2W2527.americas.hpqcorp.net ([169.254.7.6]) by G1W5782.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.193.26.0]) with mapi id 14.03.0169.001; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:54:08 +0000
From: "Barkai, Sharon" <sharon.barkai@hp.com>
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <arnatal@ac.upc.edu>
Thread-Topic: lisp-subscribe for multicast (S,G) entries
Thread-Index: AQHQyVAH1GARBjSCCUWn9ERcEsvRoJ4IoqeAgAAIH4CAAC89gIAAFW0W
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:54:07 +0000
Message-ID: <A6A0A54F-A5C2-46DF-9F5B-231DFD9BDE56@hp.com>
References: <EFC44872-80FF-4734-AC9F-CD7C92B662A9@gmail.com> <CA+YHcKGd9HK8H5KCcUu4=HLSn65rGzp03hsyGzLBBvxVp-DUOA@mail.gmail.com> <3142A65D-5027-4E8F-B91A-81ECF1BA6018@gmail.com>, <CA+YHcKHaPeNUPf14tHaNpqN8jiDVYXTG6c888iBbiupL2-eSaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YHcKHaPeNUPf14tHaNpqN8jiDVYXTG6c888iBbiupL2-eSaA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/KTk7Ar7QSYxQsiL46CGmicIRFPQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:17:48 -0700
Cc: Victor Moreno <victor@magooit.com>, "IJsbrand (Ice) Wijnands" <ice@cisco.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] lisp-subscribe for multicast (S,G) entries
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:30:15 -0000

Just a thought, maybe irrelevant but ..
Can we perhaps generalize somehow pub-sub registrations management procedures / protocol for map-assisted-overlay..
.. derive multicast channel subscription as first instantiation, followed by others such as mapping subscriptions etc.

Potentially all subscriptions will inevitably require allotted compute machinery in the back to fulfill - replicators, trigger loops. Etc.

--szb

On Aug 12, 2015, at 12:37 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <arnatal@ac.upc.edu<mailto:arnatal@ac.upc.edu>> wrote:



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com<mailto:farinacci@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want an updated spec that is ready and fully specified for implementation. I want to do an early implementation of lisp-subscribe.

Glad to hear that! That would be great to show at the IETF!

The simplicity of the proposal will be measured if I can start coding in the morning and by end of day it is all working and committed to my repository. ;-)

Hope that would be the case :)