Re: [lisp] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Wed, 12 September 2018 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77D3130ED8 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MA8UBxgSC6Ds for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F32A9130ECB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id v17-v6so846903wrr.9 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=dNF039tQD7g06BARKEh/SyB9vcu6isubrXw3lkxT7Qo=; b=Bs7n95bhxVASOhQXeS/rzeoPj3tF2AZd7r3Oqe8Eh6166mRy24aWnC1dxGgczh2Y+g pySfVw2kde1cBWoFBSzamN8fWJFhbay2EM1RdpIxT/CdT+deBUbi181rg+Tfrb3MhPR5 b5HCZRxlhOiWPM1sy3oqp7Tq79U2O6Yc05b8N9r5iyzxgE7oX5OYo6UxRiMz3bo/Wy2r e6GDZrY4KkZ7Wu88JRoXJTdfxl8X6Y+Iz6f7+DqjfeLv5siaSw1Zlc8Qr6tH1tPc1y1h YH41okfAMY5ZyRqnNGx9IN/Pk1ibh98t0T4X7LY3RYe8BgO/ak0MlrqbWsxUOGYNovdo kWww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=dNF039tQD7g06BARKEh/SyB9vcu6isubrXw3lkxT7Qo=; b=sDDaJVJ1FRu4v1YGtC1c3BDw52b/Uk9CmcwAt5ruCAVzSmWp/Xy5C5NLvi9ePWdfjp SR+xaQ7hWMsFV8TqfTfdSPDD9KgLLOjY+HWNKWMpNp4VfiLb8YbG96uhZgYfGYFhFxfH zF3k+zDoty2V+seRetzxvSHcxMX7k/m5Ef5oqaScciX/FdSi3S5mk0n4aRxCKElk/Y0r WdnJqUeDTSUDH7Fqm9PK3eJjGrtdVwGJSJueEAYWsOPyMFy5Nxr0l7MUjw1bxghOrj1Y oMVVfK9B9GHlzQm/GMuk4Eh2+MtBQhXqugzDxJRSniCU3Zj0AC8ykaUQEpd3Jg7jTj1q rK7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CdJzZgy8aoZ7RJYaM/5B5TQVoJeXQfTopT2N7Xl9k+vjJIXy0L Pxnfb5OV0OS6C5LYbOZAeNMY0g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdaDFU9s93u1XT4OiKy3lWSi7XCZyJLkZQmacoHFHfK5GfNruYIDH+W6MvEwOXGIRRUzwpiRGg==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce90:: with SMTP id r16-v6mr453948wrn.112.1536737445358; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:dc2d:473b:4ed7:e2e8? ([2001:660:330f:a4:dc2d:473b:4ed7:e2e8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l130-v6sm552237wmd.16.2018.09.12.00.30.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <9D08CA59-8AC4-4866-944E-98553C37E547@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:30:43 +0200
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <00DCC7FC-096E-4822-A702-2EE4C70327EB@gigix.net>
References: <153667812809.16741.10796738054406466412.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9D08CA59-8AC4-4866-944E-98553C37E547@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/KpkkWH5Rovy-3AcORVdRa5hr9Ps>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 07:30:49 -0000

Hi,

two quick comments inline.


> On 11 Sep 2018, at 20:13, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 3) Given the following statement:
>> "Note that while this document assumes a LISP-ALT database mapping
>>  infrastructure to illustrate certain aspects of Map-Server and Map-
>>  Resolver operation..."
>> it seems that RFC6836 should be a normative reference, as it might not be
>> possible to understand all details explained in this doc with knowing ALT.
> 
> I would like the lisp-chairs and/or Deborah to comment on this.
> 

IMO We can completely delete that sentence. The documents does a pretty good job to talk in general terms about the mapping system and the use of its front-end Map-Servers/Map-Resolvers.

In the few cases where something specific to ALT and DDT can be said the document actually does it.



>> 4) Further I would also think that I-D.ietf-lisp-mn and I-D.ietf-lisp-pubsub
>> should be normative references as the meaning of the respective bits it not
>> further specified in this doc. Or can these bits just be ignored if
>> I-D.ietf-lisp-mn and I-D.ietf-lisp-pubsub are not implemented? If so that
>> should be stated.
> 
> I would like the lisp-chairs and/or Deborah to comment on this.
> 

Those bits can be ignored if an implementer choses not to support those mechanisms.
Hence, the documents do not really need to be normative.

Ciao

L.