IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Restarting last call on LISP threats

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 19 May 2014 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52FA1A0387 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4WDKcuFc-sl for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0211.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B638D1A0015 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB441.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.944.11; Mon, 19 May 2014 14:14:05 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.206]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0944.000; Mon, 19 May 2014 14:14:05 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Restarting last call on LISP threats
Thread-Index: AQHPa58LSm48HWl6Wky1MR3KNHiENZs9MyiAgAD04oCAAJ/u8IAAAtXQgADypICAAlhbEIABfmkAgAAJsgCAAEpiAIAEFPjg
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:14:05 +0000
Message-ID: <df8bf1975fe04834bb7887ae38675983@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <536CFA13.4010102@joelhalpern.com> <4e6c0aaac8fb4aba87ab137cc49b51dc@CO2PR05MB636.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAKFn1SH_gu1+e6EsWESBsRw9EGiSQ+Z5r9E7GEhMO1FdNuM9nQ@mail.gmail.com> <1a200c5f5de041fbaf88edd1a5c3159c@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAKFn1SEAZyydpQ4cx77mthsUx1HZqMwsM6xNuL4LJjG=oL1mjw@mail.gmail.com> <860b7987207345afb282a82862ff42c0@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <F4799A7A-BAEF-458A-8C43-9DF16C9B7828@gmail.com> <8891A030-B462-48D9-83B4-4E42525F38CE@steffann.nl> <F1FD0546-65C0-4288-B017-FDA55454A528@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1FD0546-65C0-4288-B017-FDA55454A528@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-forefront-prvs: 021670B4D2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(428001)(51704005)(13464003)(377454003)(189002)(199002)(46102001)(101416001)(21056001)(31966008)(79102001)(80022001)(66066001)(81342001)(4396001)(74502001)(74662001)(77982001)(76482001)(50986999)(76176999)(2656002)(15202345003)(99396002)(19580395003)(74316001)(54356999)(19580405001)(99286001)(83322001)(86362001)(85852003)(81542001)(83072002)(15975445006)(16799955002)(20776003)(64706001)(76576001)(87936001)(33646001)(92566001)(15188155005)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB441; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/MCDDiQwnYCqlROm6oecOxyDoXE8
Cc: Roger Jorgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Restarting last call on LISP threats
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:14:18 -0000

Dino,

The Spoofer Project (http://spoofer.cmand.org/summary.php) offers a longitudinal view of BCP 38 deployment. I think that the results that they report validate Sander's objection. Furthermore, they may suggest that Sander's objection will remain valid for years to come.

                                                                                                                                   Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farinacci@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 7:37 PM
> To: Sander Steffann
> Cc: Ronald Bonica; Roger Jorgensen; lisp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [lisp] Restarting last call on LISP threats
> 
> > Unfortunately this is not unlikely :(  I certainly wouldn't consider it an
> amazing feat... BCP38 is not implemented as much as it should be.
> 
> I know there are many cases where BCP38 is not practice but more and more
> access providers due uRPF.
> 
> You only need one in the path. And the ones that don't do it are using
> resources to transit packets to possible black holes.
> 
> Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email