IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Sat, 27 April 2024 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D8EC14F6B3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9q6mpIck1blp for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF78EC14F61E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34c8f393195so392842f8f.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1714202649; x=1714807449; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tDZAzsjnyTq2V61UzlWQdNKRhR58McfXQL+aNjtcAq0=; b=QEWZaN6xpEcBzx6Prl466Z3WNvTHiJK8iIJM1YEsY6sAHWQEz8kHHvLPdC8JEUxAJp 3QYm2i7qVqh4ZCn/a5xnpNc65UfqCQzLsyZ0mawVEBA/svpewdIIjUGfNdPXxxl2theX FozAaj3F7xluPwK0gCBUba9rj789Vt8Da04cwOy8UsQLL0xl/v0YVsAhHAOAwXnD19sG ypkDOxACR6iDHIRLzugaqB2NwDfYRKPAztvH9KnEIqHVajl8/rz4tm6Gi5wcgF/Bvzt7 fG+4mBELLHL/W5meFmC6spXzDs8KYOrsquYdtcrN264DcDlinvkZgGGBCUYkqoX/j/KP C3Tg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714202649; x=1714807449; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tDZAzsjnyTq2V61UzlWQdNKRhR58McfXQL+aNjtcAq0=; b=VLXKh8KUwVxtagGOjW95N1tEODQHGn1uZ5oYtzKb0kItWRUubtvKax288i+/HoUzTr 3qdqFKFs7FunqcswF0PlwGmwpxM7tu6Ek8kOP1s4pFGwloG9vHf4ilO71ZCPJQkqywfU 4Y8TZfXkEozviNxFcuXmQ0CGzu9W0lyNYyeNV2KLvhu1838d3L46LKXdvQiRVCASVSvK ymkV9HUQwn9nh0DohGvyZ53cmsrNAQigYaJkbuMH/qE3UNJo5/9WlHlTSjqOHepB1E74 XaEbo46gqYh1fZ1bqAgy3yDI1O/j613a26nvqmhUy1Hs95zsi7m0dvKQAXpKlLbHOWT3 fsfw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVH3zfyslOwEwHk2qwIlc9rwTS2ybThfcJepYvDS1OhacCjDviTAelKx4wOFJYwRaps3jUMBGwW2XZXLPwn
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyHLr8/HQp0ogRPFVg2fUFHntG6d0gMZ0IXlxyiTABHhsIFZgY3 PH+0Mmy5ocjIj7KR38o0OclJRKvs4G6Vv/bBLiGPMWIj45AHdvkHwj4AU5qZ8mqpuIoylnqfxZO dniY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFZ174cQ7MKyRAJu7F8ZRVCJ1eahcZt+D4EJqsakyVj1KV/3tNkB8ZZeeC54bficTS4CmOB1Q==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:f4c4:0:b0:343:70bc:4578 with SMTP id h4-20020adff4c4000000b0034370bc4578mr2963926wrp.70.1714202648460; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:8056:18d4:7cff:96ad]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11-20020adffb0b000000b0034b1a91be72sm12326240wrr.14.2024.04.27.00.24.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <0364AA28-4ACA-4032-9A94-A8F6543BA77A@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:23:36 +0200
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2CA4DF04-AC5D-4824-9F2D-B3BB70D80869@gigix.net>
References: <895d9394-e334-45e8-b4c7-35a8c8c9448f@joelhalpern.com> <0364AA28-4ACA-4032-9A94-A8F6543BA77A@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/MqD38fxVzreu1q1p2oUUe-cooqU>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 07:24:12 -0000

Hi Dino,

> On 27 Apr 2024, at 00:19, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think this is what transpired. 
> 
> (1) we wrote lisp-geo with exact packet syntax as RFC 8060. 
> (2) We received comments from Enke, Naiming, Chris Hopps, and Acee. 
> (3) We changed the format to be consistent with OSPF, ISIS, and BGP (the lisp-geo Document Change section documents this and when). 
> (4) I asked if we could change RFC 8060 and pretty sure Luigi said yes.

I do not recall any of this. I remember agreeing on changing the format. I admit I did not pay attention to the code point (most probably assuming that it will be different). 

But I will check my email archive to see if there is anything related or that may suggest otherwise I will share it on the mailing list.

Ciao

L.


> 
> That’s my memory. 
> 
> Dino
> 
>> On Apr 26, 2024, at 6:07 PM, Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>> 
>> It's up to Luigi and Padma, but my read is that if it was private it was not a WG decision.
>> 
>> Yours,
>> 
>> Joel
>> 
>> On 4/26/2024 6:05 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>>> Can you find an on-list email where such a conclusion was reached.  That would certainly explain your choice.
>>> I searched (before I sent the last email) and could not find anything. Likely it was private.
>>> 
>>> Dino

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status