IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-02.txt

Lori Jakab <lojakab@cisco.com> Mon, 22 May 2017 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lojakab@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE73127735; Mon, 22 May 2017 02:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y21KwHjBPBAy; Mon, 22 May 2017 02:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E50127241; Mon, 22 May 2017 02:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4331; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1495446052; x=1496655652; h=date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; bh=423+V/yLXjdH/HQr15P3YFLz75jcUCNwwkFaRdsruNc=; b=SFnufUty5NgiHyF+/IxSlkBUyTWxofjVutwquqxLWuE3z0Vx3+y0SQvX ZBhu5U/+4x5fZNGlFgTeR3f/8X2zkZain47/W4MpEan/pw0zq0xErniiI 2WRCaT8Pae3jQlHTxs0EFQXp3ctPjpJj5/3B58KLddENo8ZWmtltB7XYZ U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,377,1491264000"; d="scan'208,217";a="652010912"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2017 09:40:50 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-109-165.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-109-165.cisco.com [10.61.109.165]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4M9enCw006478; Mon, 22 May 2017 09:40:49 GMT
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:40:47 +0000
In-Reply-To: <A3D33D6D-3DEC-4545-81DC-A378C41D172C@gigix.net>
References: <A3D33D6D-3DEC-4545-81DC-A378C41D172C@gigix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----JJYXSE8VEKTD50XG1LASUHUCX2PTQE"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: lisp-chairs@ietf.org
From: Lori Jakab <lojakab@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6C7B3AB6-3150-4340-8568-32E2A36C1D5D@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/OumJBnTYsbzvwbSgia4-sFWiGbA>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:40:55 -0000

Support

On May 19, 2017 12:06:45 PM GMT+03:00, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Authors of the document draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs-02.txt 
>[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs/
><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-predictive-rlocs/>]
>asked for WG adoption.
>
>This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption. 
>The call ends on  June 2nd 2017.
>
>Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval
>or disapproval.
>
>Recall that:
>
>- This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>expected to 
>modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>content is solid.  
>Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>changes to its content.
>
>- If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your
>reasons why, 
>  and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>
>- If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>and we can 
>  begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>                      
>                                                                       
>Luigi and Joel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email