Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Albert López <alopez@ac.upc.edu> Fri, 20 July 2018 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <alopez@ac.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB38130E72 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 22:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYIqN_rk0QdD for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 22:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.edu [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE52130E40 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 22:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from correu-1.ac.upc.es (correu-1.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.91]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6K5Wfxe007689 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 07:32:41 +0200
Received: from [147.83.35.39] (sirius.ac.upc.es [147.83.35.39]) by correu-1.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C828C35B for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 07:32:35 +0200 (CEST)
To: lisp@ietf.org
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net> <664A4380-2E20-464C-A825-3620A00901AC@cisco.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Albert_L=c3=b3pez?= <alopez@ac.upc.edu>
Message-ID: <95c54d74-3a35-fdc6-658f-fe1fec7a4bfc@ac.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 07:32:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <664A4380-2E20-464C-A825-3620A00901AC@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B6E64D511375F07D2D6C3A85"
Content-Language: ca
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/OzqCFiYRTtVI6mxGBK3AMLCjHWw>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 05:32:49 -0000

+1

On 19/7/18 23:35, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote:
>
> I also support handing this document to the AD
>
> *From: *lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Luigi Iannone 
> <ggx@gigix.net>
> *Date: *Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM
> *To: *"lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *"lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
>
> Folks,
>
> As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus 
> to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf 
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after 
> the few fixes that I asked).
>
> Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last 
> Call, to end July 20th, 2018.
>
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that 
> it is ready for handing to the AD.
>
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain 
> what it would take to address your concerns.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Luigi & Joel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp