IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 18 January 2021 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554223A132D; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:26:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.972
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.972 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.373, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DxIKLnj8V-ct; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:26:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1713A132B; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:26:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7340; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1610976380; x=1612185980; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=xWpepj6SbTh0Xwm+Jdr2pJR1Sn6D1wo+WaUHAG0Mw8M=; b=Luje9CRuwimwso4oNgG651Wh5Fc93lReAa9i/Z5VIlcOp+equDjCurmv WuKd3Vv+g5sLVz5dN1B3mUPvmgTusAl1Egdc5kNiWmIsoNpOToTjzSV5C 6Y8LKjBoY5rttNqt+tjGFET09BRDZ31v9Beibk0aZCLBF6kV9R0DF7C3K w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0BDAADEiwVglxbLJq1iHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGBfgQBAQsBgyBXASASL4Q/iQSIJiUDlCCGNYFoBAcBAQEKAwEBGAEKDAQBAYRKAoFwJjcGDgIDAQEBAwIDAQEBAQUBAQECAQYEFAEBAQEBAQEBhjYMhXMBAQEDAQEBGwYrIAsFCwsOCicDAgInChURBhMdBIMFAYJmIA+uQ3aBMoVZhGMKBoE4AYFShRYNhkFBggCBEScMEIJWPoJdAQGBKgESAYM6NIIsBIFVEIE/BFMiOScDCzIZBgEIJpxPnDCDAYMogTeXCQMfgyqKMIU1jRyCP7E0RoNwAgQGBQIWgSVHImlwMxoIGxU7KgGCPj4SGQ2OLQ4JiGKFRUADMDcCBgEJAQEDCY0cAQE
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,356,1602547200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="32743045"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 18 Jan 2021 13:26:15 +0000
Received: from [10.61.218.107] ([10.61.218.107]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10IDQFw2019893 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:26:15 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <26AD53D1-BF1A-4812-98C6-B092C85409C3@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D946BD54-BCAD-4585-A3C5-5DAD04BEAD39"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:11:36 +0100
In-Reply-To: <D1C7BD0C-30C6-4A14-82D4-FB7748F70EE5@gigix.net>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
References: <D1C7BD0C-30C6-4A14-82D4-FB7748F70EE5@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.218.107, [10.61.218.107]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/P4eOixs6XpMJwp9tT0URcDaFNiQ>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:26:22 -0000

Just poking my nose in here, this is a cool draft. I say, go for it.  Depending on implementation, it may address the very problem I was attempting to solve with NERD: that first dropped packet.

I have one small suggestion and a question:

The suggestion:

It would be useful to discuss what statistics should be kept when experimenting.  Specifically: number of subscribes (prior to or after the first time one saw an EID), the number of map updates over time (I’m betting there’s a lot of stability out there, but that’s just me), number of subscribers.

The question:

How would an xTR UNsubscribe from mapping notifications?  I would imagine this would amount to a new map request that clears the N bit for appropriate EID-Records?

Eliot



> On 13 Jan 2021, at 08:19, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The authors of  draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub submitted a new version addressing the issues raised during SECDIR review.
> The document seems mature and stable and authors are asking for formal WG Last Call.
> 
> This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end January 28th, 2021.
> 
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready to be handed over to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> NOTE: silence IS NOT consensus!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email