IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] Rechartering Thread 1: Promised work item: work items currently in the charter but not finished

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Tue, 14 March 2023 09:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ED2C151711 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7bnt8gFYazH for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94707C1516EB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id az3-20020a05600c600300b003ed2920d585so2776235wmb.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1678787191; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xVPg/sJ4dVOkXkeB5XXpsjulVlZUC1mzvecTNH3Z/uI=; b=aZ0GwFa4Ao6dybOSn2Wdxf25rVI4NlOjtDfg9puCy77rn3sBrvhrnDpZRXukTb/Wur /ilzNBt8h4cfK7Jx4YkXY9elWbbTUvrjIGt7gOStEaNNpjo7BsYn7j59iS4CQZty+XBN 3qB1sBd9lQUcHaEDpwTJh+Ij5eAu5As8BL7Z/NDIwrXTnruPdQxbBoz9aOhJQz1nXfhS XoizqH+pN6yoRU1U/uWsVz8rWDsmVAiYO5k+syMZJRulDRqa5BBDCcpFRBemcU+UbE9F 8T95wrZNsqVOx0+SSq1x7L1lLSmUabzagwYTcsErZ13QiyXk9A61BL0ZCo+e+PC4fDwj RuSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678787191; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xVPg/sJ4dVOkXkeB5XXpsjulVlZUC1mzvecTNH3Z/uI=; b=kB6FtysKgBuY0vrXHdWetQBMdtUOakQX5Xv41RkehJDS3uTohXTLPGWynpdyz0elDS 6hFQr/e1X42SQeo6vJGTZ5eL1DOmG/W9LT909F3grBA0HXSzAZ8dqrIUun6xfnz4XcK9 pYa8RdAF37yXt6u9XRJlU5AqdPpo5BMRjQGKAPWooo471FVN7RaUZ4ys3qgisn8gPECD X7t2EyquE2a++N4za4svy6y1hxJkyeez7WrbsfZHQmtCe3ojnCSnsFWsAzLu55iSs2/A GzRpKlp8qgIflm+x8R4QkGnvd0X2fW+3P+bFBRw50wrT5gHD4XxuKlSOn76LqWkIwJ5a zudw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVfqlyCMoZzFPPgK9zeTqPSfJfXe1EPru24Oa3ikTHrPEirCYP5 xwvDXP65Kkv1PwyZKbW9lHRtIILsSu0QwVsrFNhb6Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8s2GHDdrQmPEojPN6amyh7pcXUfS1qG/vegfYV3v7vaKzQ8aSSaHHl+PtTJ/964eKb+O223Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:cc6:b0:3ed:2949:9847 with SMTP id fk6-20020a05600c0cc600b003ed29499847mr3991847wmb.10.1678787191092; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([37.170.200.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f24-20020a1cc918000000b003e203681b26sm2294481wmb.29.2023.03.14.02.46.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_201881C1-A474-47ED-A07A-F2BBFBF25765"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
Message-Id: <9D45B7AA-2534-4F12-93FA-3B461EA3829B@gigix.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:46:19 +0100
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org
To: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/P8jj5Ii93YX8j54_UlOS2oUmmj8>
Subject: [lisp] Rechartering Thread 1: Promised work item: work items currently in the charter but not finished
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:46:35 -0000

Hi LISP WG,


As for the subject, this email starts the discussion about: Promised work item: work items currently in the charter but not finished

There are a bunch of unfinished WG drafts promised in the charter, namely:

LISP Mobility: candidate document LISP-MN but does not solve everything should we enlarge the scope?
LISP Yang Model: We are pretty close to finish this one
LISP NAT Traversal: we have a candidate document

The above documents look like we should make an effort and finish them.

There are also a bunch of WG documents that for which we should decide what to do (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lisp/documents/)

Does the WG consider we need to move all of them forward (and in this case we need people to commit in finishing them) or should some of them be dropped?

Please send us back your thoughts.


Padma and Luigi

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status