Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Mon, 04 November 2013 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6889B21E813B for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:36:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZyZDdymuI12j for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B4F21E8136 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450CD45; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:36:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d39rc+vIKxCI; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:36:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:8640:1::5fe:6f10:3802:e9a2] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:8640:1:0:5fe:6f10:3802:e9a2]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B4553D; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:36:32 +0100 (CET)
References: <20131030154454.587D918C143@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <15CC7F54-075E-4EB8-940B-8DCB198134A2@apnic.net> <E6AD700C-DC48-48DB-9FF5-A24C6121834C@gmail.com> <D68CD130-50BC-42AE-95E5-A4EBEEB20808@apnic.net> <8119249a5b4cb0604726fa7560538cf3@bartschnet.de> <FBB83D5B-E5C1-493E-8FAD-2AF489759CBF@steffann.nl> <82F5CF42-2E3A-444A-8449-39B01C0B2C3B@gigix.net> <3C9E1CFD-642E-4590-92BB-E1E5F65F8B02@steffann.nl> <92D11F1F-CED7-4A98-B45F-FD91727624FE@gigix.net> <2BEFEBB6-AD3F-4493-8628-21F273D3CAB2@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <2BEFEBB6-AD3F-4493-8628-21F273D3CAB2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63AD59A6-0888-4D66-B3A7-983637F94452@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B511)
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 09:36:32 +0100
To: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 08:36:57 -0000

Hi, 

> We see just this (peering) happening between LISP Service Providers in the US now.

What exactly do you mean with 'peering' in this context?

Cheers,
Sander