Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf)
Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2022 21:39 UTC
Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F063A10D5; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gn-9ZXZXUUA; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa1-x34.google.com (mail-oa1-x34.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCCD3A10E6; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa1-x34.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-d6ca46da48so3365365fac.12; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DV0z87rPM5RaaVQY5IuLVN1zm2d7IQs9qLLg26onJ/E=; b=krKFoldB9H/fxq0xN8UBDDseFEozDdhSNPvdb8R+C6yRrUjQXoohQroCPDW0zhxMHd OQ1GKB/IqhHeaCSpR/EOdD2nSHB2Ey0Xrt8lVm8sQW7AIoFkkuwDRg8VY4GyEDe/ZII4 /X5moSqJ8PnRaoTl1ppkz+Hzuyz3VVHlHVS3mjem3WQoUAIs4nqVyDNn5+XcPf0dyTE7 I0RhZ6tvh2p5oQnrCUCDcA2PHRQ0SW2Fw6T6AnzJ1Hnb/e+5mSPvKUjTAAilVwmGCa4p N8XBJ779bFiDHQprFbHeE7N9CL/k7F4ezGFVN28U6PHz8Mmt5uDe3W+mQqOHChV6Y9zO Ab4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DV0z87rPM5RaaVQY5IuLVN1zm2d7IQs9qLLg26onJ/E=; b=nRzWV18vimFiq+ripJ9RiGHHsZITtRqZSCYewsvAi3ukvHXT/UbIeR+vByu84krsis 1ctPx0yKLbQvY0qVzIaPMDjJrk9HPO+cT3Pf4aEprd6z8andmvkaHjlW29JpV+9SEcYC XoYglr8h4ZRequGNFPgqc7/TjAoo9vk5Jq57d7+PDBetaATQQo4qZCyiIKjh8KWJeUSz GGOcSlXHI6ccgkbXNS3SDPgM+jPH3/WDnA4ZBbtSc1nQ9bfeW2GvSBNMoXEkahTL21Br SmYLsmDANlApfaRrrAzJY4tQNUo87vEsowkjAZ7+XyK1q2Sqrv70Jx04BttZVd/W1IQM CDaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WXeFnuaWVWoDebirYqdTsLwQBqPEI5dQ0tABWW4Nooz0Cii98 lxbx7s12Iv1NS0Ks3jZFou4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxil8bdEpzzoiH7eDNd/1Y8FLL3eWxuJeQTaZW8nSapglQ56qfHjosGruQ1GOA3dCuF+c8crA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:14c3:b0:da:3703:329b with SMTP id l3-20020a05687014c300b000da3703329bmr322901oab.54.1649885946456; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([107.116.92.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p63-20020a4a4842000000b00329c9188688sm53894ooa.36.2022.04.13.14.39.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 14:39:03 -0700
Message-Id: <FA02AF88-E30E-4606-9149-D447D40A666D@gmail.com>
References: <BYAPR11MB27436C53350DFC8DB21C5775C4EC9@BYAPR11MB2743.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, lisp@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB27436C53350DFC8DB21C5775C4EC9@BYAPR11MB2743.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Prakash Jain (prakjain)" <prakjain@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19F5047e)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Q2_xTmuDJTkYzZWIVnqbm4bMMQk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 21:39:13 -0000
> On Apr 13, 2022, at 2:33 PM, Prakash Jain (prakjain) <prakjain@cisco.com> wrote: > > Since its vendor specific LCAF, vendor might intend to use this for its vendor spefic usage/purpose in generic lisp message. Means, if recever is same vendor as transmitter, that usage is applicable, otherwise ignore/drop vendor specific LCAF but generic lisp message should still be procssed as per lisp specification. Agree. But even with same vendor but old implementation, the LCAF type should be ignored by old when new sends to old. Dino
- [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lisp-ve… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Prakash Jain (prakjain)
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Prakash Jain (prakjain)
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Unknown LCAF Types (?) (draft-ietf-lis… Luigi Iannone