Re: [lisp] Questions about draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-03

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Wed, 19 February 2014 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9221A0510 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1M2Gswpy-FJi for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4151A05E7 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:53 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,506,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="49694946"
Received: from faucon.inria.fr ([138.96.201.73]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 19 Feb 2014 18:38:49 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <EB7B93D4-E1CF-402C-98E5-67D8A720018F@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:38:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <312D979B-55D5-40E3-B99E-270847A0BE8C@inria.fr>
References: <20140218144825842648.087ffc67@sniff.de> <5689A37C-B58A-4144-AB01-A61DFCE1B999@gmail.com> <A5E2D567-7C8D-4024-AE61-CFDA9400123A@inria.fr> <A948F13B-023B-43FB-92EC-D4DA6A832404@gmail.com> <D232D17D-49D4-484C-96AB-5C5D48291AF9@inria.fr> <561A89E6-B2AB-4EF3-8FFC-B87BEBF680E2@gmail.com> <3482805F-EC6F-4AAE-B0DB-49B619020A3C@inria.fr> <EB7B93D4-E1CF-402C-98E5-67D8A720018F@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/QZOPpyQgsPHQz265CxYYmfQu8wo
Cc: Clarence Filsfils <cf@cisco.com>, Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Questions about draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-03
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:38:58 -0000

On 19 Feb 2014, at 18:32, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Well it is not just theoretical, it can happen as soon as you have two
>> egress points, even in active/active mode.
>> 
>> Imagine you have two identical egress points in your network (let say
>> that they can both reach the whole Internet) depending on the IGP the
>> traffic from a part of the network will go to one and the traffic from
>> the other part of the network will go to the second router.
>> Unfortunately the set of destination is not the same in both part of
>> the network so when you fallback to one router after the outage of the
>> other one, you will have misses.
>> 
>> We have evaluated that on our network (that is primary/backup) and
>> simulated it as active/active and noticed that the storm would not
>> negligible.
> 
> Yes, understand Damien. One has to decide how much machinery one puts in a protocol for events that don't happen often.
> 

I could offer you a solution to avoid packet drops, but you might not
like.  It starts with a "b" and finishes with a "uffer" :-)

> Dino
>