Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt

"Fabio Maino (fmaino)" <fmaino@cisco.com> Tue, 02 June 2020 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fmaino@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBAE3A0CD9; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=W7iFisgF; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=rI4UIdQQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0CWRd-YiKH8; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EFDD3A0D5B; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5534; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1591119279; x=1592328879; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=aEn7K+Vrrqb3WTaGwSvc60fqF5ocHRbYer3OGRz3CFQ=; b=W7iFisgFTTNbPc0OtktOTnx2ecII+SkjI8q4jefCiEnqpjvMSwctQkHr 3dQUtPqjSa+0hVhAK7tOlYkPu8i5qUbxD5Yt46g/AHXS7URR7FOpsSubV 94XH4OphYrgvuH0sWoqzWQ3IkfqTmlrsaK/EK8fVgJHTtiAbU+K8G372m w=;
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DNAgCijNZe/40NJK1lHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIE5BQELA?= =?us-ascii?q?YFRKSkHb1gvLAqEG4NGA40fJZhNglIDVQsBAQEMAQEYCwoCBAEBhEQCF4IEA?= =?us-ascii?q?iQ3Bg4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FWQyFcgEBAQECAQEBEBERDAEBJ?= =?us-ascii?q?QcLAQ8CAQgOCgICJgICAiULFRACBA4FIoMEAYJLAw4gAQ6kUwKBOYhhdoEyg?= =?us-ascii?q?wEBAQWBNgIOQUKCaRiCDgmBDioBgmOJYxqBQT+BEScMEIJNPoJnAQECAQEYh?= =?us-ascii?q?F0zgi2Rd6BfgQAKgliIMpA+HoJmgRSHdIN0iTmEf5pWlAQCBAIEBQIOAQEFg?= =?us-ascii?q?WkjgVZwFRohKgGCPglHFwINkECBJgEIgkOFFIVCdDcCBgEHAQEDCXyLLwGBD?= =?us-ascii?q?wEB?=
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AGsz7MxHz/UQLScFjwPJu251GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401QObUoTU6uICjefK4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTA?= =?us-ascii?q?QMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS8n/aFzC5Hu/8W1aFh?= =?us-ascii?q?D2LwEgIOPzF8bbhNi20Obn/ZrVbk1IiTOxbKk0Ig+xqFDat9Idhs1pLaNixw?= =?us-ascii?q?=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,465,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="477810309"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Jun 2020 17:34:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 052HYcB3015394 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:34:38 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:34:38 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:34:37 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:34:37 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=hXng7RmV2MhDOIX0P8lpHwuHQuiqpGOSbZjPm0HiLj+e3tVTB3RwNSwrSLAWwiD95pJDWhquayE+fRkFfnLcST+bcuZMwfG4Q2HSXLtqEj+guqTB6SiWF800HAr9KkWDDrGSRF84vS4FC4Xm20VwGKg7gGPMz5P9rih+hXpma0nNZJNFFZ2GkSi+cQJ3M5lPCtvprgOd3koxq+XjupHUtuy/HA/gFSKPmls8gErCOl74Non3zA9EWgq+DjSRhgQrzSNZfGRjrMo5f3JWBBAR9baL6HFfEap+l+s7rGAjXLTTWLGqBytFQH7+eKGeWMCyKvSBt6EvnEtLFulfTckzPQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aEn7K+Vrrqb3WTaGwSvc60fqF5ocHRbYer3OGRz3CFQ=; b=Mis8dVJ+qy8gK2FNK+imOmxOG2xeEb6saHa4W+Sa/8opKDHe23bdlzYPP55fMuxDb0X9C2eqmcrx6AkAa/FKdbtkryz/lQVJOmlwcGjrC3PjyGhV89Q8eSU0b2x7wlLEiaZcJOP6ozmV4dffkfn/8zl17O3OA2NMfdmaCNQpQPEP3Izcda0Y9b1SmLITkAxsKdzbP+AQ+duHUVFfYLUZe0vKdERbkSfKVQZ+XwJaW0QOSl4RK0UmPFy4XNJEMYS5tji4B3wmwABqOXQdmXv8hSgGaD/+EUDRyq9cOMkQvIRM3Q+VZTl1kOUeIrmfpjo7WNGybdsWqnXPimKCxAa6Bw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aEn7K+Vrrqb3WTaGwSvc60fqF5ocHRbYer3OGRz3CFQ=; b=rI4UIdQQuzXVnFX/poOdWcJdZk9J5W90JMdeLVcPDOQ2tV3lmLjbJzSsA+aLF+mMBW0AsPncYuTMfCWD1jC5RxCcSOePYH5+5T0kOdeyln0J0Mu8kQEk9OMwyUc6UsZSfpjabQbPTd96PCjvwZHpFGbk7nJphD3PpDoFP1xbooo=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c9::20) by BY5PR11MB4321.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1bf::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3045.17; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:34:36 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d05d:f20e:c1a4:75b]) by BY5PR11MB4420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d05d:f20e:c1a4:75b%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.023; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:34:36 +0000
From: "Fabio Maino (fmaino)" <fmaino@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
CC: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWN9dTvRRFniF18keFCh3eOwz6RqjDQJKA//+MQ4CAAh2cAIAAOLGA
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:34:36 +0000
Message-ID: <B9E6E012-2210-42D5-B16D-BC542CF52313@cisco.com>
References: <159099007522.25563.11308110319037900150@ietfa.amsl.com> <2930E31B-6388-46F6-A366-FC8B71721AED@gigix.net> <0E828956-16D3-43CA-9341-8833FC9B8A8E@cisco.com> <F06EBB57-C6F9-4490-91F5-38F1589C0643@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <F06EBB57-C6F9-4490-91F5-38F1589C0643@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
authentication-results: gigix.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gigix.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [75.25.137.103]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c4245510-d484-4e02-e256-08d8071b386e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR11MB4321:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR11MB432178188D45548F956CBC87C28B0@BY5PR11MB4321.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0422860ED4
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wmysWIMrzDasiX/9X86OwnBVWIR+zfrH01noxSodIl9mIrdnrOwTivq1S6B6B2tXqGJ9ndnkDO3EITI4EnqZzzEN82h6DL38+cJ4shhc1ULHnP2cZFKEWnz8vARHCsUFfOxnZvKmt4vHgjvFT8qKkZnkEP5S3xLdH9EYDC4G5oymlnr3Q1OerluDvaPVrk9xH7dVWqWVQg6M0rHpIpi6nHvorS9mODDhTD7vtIhTu8QnzBeUA649KXahns26Z54LW52iKPQgjMLYzP4nD+jze2SHqSSFHTzvAY5mOga7MLrUSPuG2MaPrGWbr6p9U0PzqkGGZO3nKPxFMRcn/PQ11/LjBIB1GgaFwzyQ+CiYBxRPBxK0DakRapQ3KIJ30pN1FslkuBpIrbccJ/5DiusIwA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4420.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(346002)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(396003)(8936002)(54906003)(71200400001)(36756003)(2616005)(316002)(66574014)(86362001)(186003)(2906002)(6512007)(6916009)(5660300002)(66446008)(66556008)(26005)(66476007)(64756008)(6486002)(53546011)(6506007)(76116006)(478600001)(33656002)(66946007)(8676002)(4326008)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 0PZ+6Umxhr8fRGZEcmMcZnv1AYcZLIN8FYaO/H+exVdGgbT00aMx4qNFWHmQv6wTBYNnDj2EpNR1orWGuj+OYDz053CfwGWRDSZW7lVt+0cnhfm3+Qc+U3s7gReOpQYtf9oRx2A95UeEzsi7ERoY2MDQAonQfFhCYDXvfW8PsXQFUkWb5OhCzFCWDijOtKNtXvREPOWV/Hb5tKDE1WareaLXX/SuYWwSB5SWLiwr7SZahAUoE/0j+F8eGTw6pgTK05csI9aKnxCW7ZscRfx3cZDTSMrSEkhQb9bX1N5gy5WjlBTQy//LKAUCzzWtAB2OgNgSbMoM4MdMbU0xZUdwZHsAEwgk3xEs0pdKqLlwbO4lrhOirpHGl9Z6plns30BdfudGa31fcCG73HQxH+s7WnCjs1Z8+mJEnAALw9sFhct6Muw4P7rg+gLhdnWH1s1Rc+3TkyzvMnltNv17Ucm4CyyUdNc+zDrOXwGg5FREyFc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <68CA106AF3A3E84D840A17476D58D406@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c4245510-d484-4e02-e256-08d8071b386e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jun 2020 17:34:36.3858 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: mzDD+fXl/mqzBP7A5tWatqN3fKQQ2aF57xovk3sj+9PAtjSf7OGyUwVDVJuBVIpjdtHh6jBp6rmR7UGwGkmaxg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR11MB4321
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/R8vzuvSyXSlX6AzgBLyYEttURqc>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:34:41 -0000

Ciso Luigi, please see below...

´╗┐On 6/2/20, 12:11 AM, "Luigi Iannone" <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:



    > On 1 Jun 2020, at 07:53, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <fmaino@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 
    > Ciao Luigi, 
    > The reason is to allow to experiment with shim headers and non-shim headers at the same time. As you may remember shim headers have a more fixed encodng and must be located before non-shim headers.

    That is OK for me. 

    But my question is why this:

    > 0x7E to 0x7F:  Experimentation and testing	

FM> The two above are for experimentation of NON shim headers

    >     0x80 to 0xFD:  Unassigned (shim headers)	
    >     0xFE to 0xFF:  Experimentation and testing

>FM These two are for experimentation of shim headers. 

Shim headers are placed (and processed) first, so we want to give the freedom to experiment with both. 

For example, one would want to experiment with a shim header (identified by 0xFE) that carries some special metadata for IPv4 payloads, while someone else would want to experiment with IPv8 payloads (identified with 0x7E). A third person might want to experiment, at the same time, with a shim header that carries special metadata for IPv8. 

Fabio

  




    Instead of this (range has been adapted):

    0x7E to 0xFB:  Unassigned (shim headers)	
    0xFC to 0xFF:  Experimentation and testing

    ??

    Certainly I am missing something ;-)

    Ciao

    L.



    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Fabio
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > On 5/31/20, 10:47 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
    > 
    >    Thank you for updating the document.
    > 
    >    I have a quick question.
    > 
    >    Looking at the next protocol values we now see:
    > 
    >     0x7E to 0x7F:  Experimentation and testing	
    >     0x80 to 0xFD:  Unassigned (shim headers)	
    >     0xFE to 0xFF:  Experimentation and testing
    > 
    >    Can you provide a rationale why not having just one bigger experimentation and testing range instead of two with an unassigned range in the middle?
    > 
    >    Thanks
    > 
    >    Ciao
    > 
    >    L.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >> On 1 Jun 2020, at 07:41, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
    >> 
    >> 
    >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
    >> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF.
    >> 
    >>       Title           : LISP Generic Protocol Extension
    >>       Authors         : Fabio Maino
    >>                         Jennifer Lemon
    >>                         Puneet Agarwal
    >>                         Darrel Lewis
    >>                         Michael Smith
    >> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt
    >> 	Pages           : 15
    >> 	Date            : 2020-05-31
    >> 
    >> Abstract:
    >>  This document describes extentions to the Locator/ID Separation
    >>  Protocol (LISP) Data-Plane, via changes to the LISP header, to
    >>  support multi-protocol encapsulation.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe/
    >> 
    >> There are also htmlized versions available at:
    >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15
    >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15
    >> 
    >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
    >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
    >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
    >> 
    >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
    >> 
    >> 
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> lisp mailing list
    >> lisp@ietf.org
    >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
    > 
    >