IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-crypto-01 - Call for WG Adoption

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 05 December 2014 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002101ADEA3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:08:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1IH0VCx-FJrb for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C6D1A6F41 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D18BED6; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:08:34 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pyERpim_kqQZ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:08:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.11] (unknown [86.46.31.148]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D646CBE83; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 22:08:32 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54822CE0.7050109@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:08:32 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
References: <D35D7CD0-20E5-4210-8025-7C92441DD339@gigix.net> <5480B13C.4090203@cisco.com> <97DA0D20-84D3-4478-8F90-C033E67172CD@gmail.com> <5481DCB6.6070300@cisco.com> <B8414A88-F630-4FC3-A2FC-05235D78D483@gmail.com> <54822778.6050505@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54822778.6050505@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/REYnjQMGnDxhdnoXhtsfdjbLvQc
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-crypto-01 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 22:08:44 -0000


On 05/12/14 21:45, Fabio Maino wrote:
> On 12/5/14, 9:36 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> Hi Dino,
>>> I have no problems with the control plane part. An encap with
>>> multiprotocol support would allow to do IPsec encap before LISP
>>> encap, and could be used with the unauthenticated DH mechanism that
>>> you propose.
>> Well draft-farinacci-lisp-crypto-01 with LISP-SEC can give you an
>> authenticated DH mechanism as well.
> 
> yes, but the DH mechanism itself is unauthenticated.

There is no problem in figuring out a way to bind a DH and
an authentication exchange. That's been done many times in
different protocols.

S.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status