Re: [lisp] Read this latest diff file for 6833bis

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 17 September 2018 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDECC130EDA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ad-fus2Ef15 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47EE130EEF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so7724579plt.4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=q3NBQ3anqk940ITXPRwA8A6EYPNPOSlgmhhfJXzHLmA=; b=Zekyy/bCjBBfj53SdMbCga8wd8m05vMI0N/qA+0fLMLDXi0iEsE/X4soURAzEC57vs crxbbl8GU6VF7LOQvDhf6aSItfo7F0C/qV2VAw31ksi4Up7vwt4gl9nFHrVeV0J7bTSC I1/yY7FJhuU+68u+NMswC2ROfNJaSOtH5P4pSC+nolXhjRweWhoRMKQpEvXPUdPydJWa T6n6OaY8tAgnzB/04TsluUhLK6CCsy2NgkK3K2E3PGstnIXwnd6c1xLg2es/fx/EqHEf K1iH7qmxiXpAyi5leV+o1lRJBk8G6dV8NbachnzuU75k36XGqyJCbzLzWXJUrP6x4cvt mvvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=q3NBQ3anqk940ITXPRwA8A6EYPNPOSlgmhhfJXzHLmA=; b=jiGwc3gQnPG0ee/C7B5smDgdy8c6cgkkR3+JxHz3Z5/m8quHa9dYf0vd5YuzhD3gds kt+AgIcmqPTU8AvbBXMLiRGScY+CqZYpLpk7Amhg7p5OWqsvPF0PmJuWrwxoMUYvYLGO vANQAGBh9uheUZZReAAb3/uTyK7tk02U82Kw+Z2WkwqMnTFjXOLr6GN251NBeG3rjNUm cSjk/YsqIpZ4TbcyB3BwKWU784tcBRyI7mV+JHykSdn9SaQh25IntYlnSJTyb0R/SOcR QIZgVbHssIvgLTiMRpl8mVMTYlkRh6xlh+FSrWH72b3FDWVU9wrtq7gWhtbytimU5BHY 9Qgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DKhRTfs2QeqxSeHzSq02xiIQC1X4KpXomi5nkWmwgOqApWS+W1 NjrOJShcfLfVIXD5/DewrTY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdba1zwhH01N1I7h/Ul3hS2EtI5Kh9G/c81NL69o5RSZeldzfqGNzmUlBrylDwtTZBzivDqu3A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:25ab:: with SMTP id y40-v6mr25161848pla.120.1537204333083; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.70] ([4.28.87.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3-v6sm26867536pfq.10.2018.09.17.10.12.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1fa31f7-90b6-e176-41e4-6bd0b7feb48e@bartschnet.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:12:11 -0700
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E0572CDB-3458-49BC-895C-BE93D816FE60@gmail.com>
References: <CD288D23-E89E-4833-8E21-A326D5CBE63B@gmail.com> <c1fa31f7-90b6-e176-41e4-6bd0b7feb48e@bartschnet.de>
To: "Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics" <ietf=40bartschnet.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/SIgYWxMiydAVnwWVp_-tShieudM>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Read this latest diff file for 6833bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:12:25 -0000

It doesn’t make semantic sense to have anycast addresses for ITRs since they are sender/encapsulators and nothing gets sent to them as a service discovery entity. However, obviously, an xTR, is both a co-located ITR and ETR, in which case, an anycast RLOC be assigned to it (the ETR part of it).

Dino

> On Sep 17, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics <ietf=40bartschnet.de@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Am 17.09.18 um 18:04 schrieb Dino Farinacci:
>> Also from Renne/Darrel comments about anycast addressing for ETRs. Reworded some of that paragraph.
> 
> Great!
> 
> Did I miss implicit statements about anycast addresses of map-servers and ITRs or is there no rule?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Renne
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp