Re: [lisp] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E3B1A913E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:38:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjG22PuGrKoW for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C741A9050 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id g62so3029197wme.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=49LZKMA+UGsehSs9jlwpjgHfkCVyaO5ZWKhjB5vj/tc=; b=iFqXZrFqRs2mST0pLDf6Aua8aFgXJw/TBNziMY8fOVYKOil5u1fcDGh0cqoMVzPuyD lba5cy9XVrC9VMKh8b2M6jL53V3Hka5sgPqoYiMRWUCoQvdNHSwvNhNbwxjOQvQ3IpYw SqGdnGZMJbdvZgefhznAb5fOyHMgXursHO30nSxHfPAjl2ARupD31EVkpV5/s8hN05up 1qkBg4bzFfj7jtH9AHLcvK8J6kG7A4jjXbQKssZnK7S2YvGlnLPiSvvo/u4KZbxm7BbH x+C8seNmELeSnTekzFRdxL2cYcoadvJqxPIZk0q9tqWqLUEtNTDfLSPSYCABz5F14opD Nn9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=49LZKMA+UGsehSs9jlwpjgHfkCVyaO5ZWKhjB5vj/tc=; b=B00tLMK0q0uKu48DNvd78zUIXKC6dhqtMZjzDEPhoGujMyneP8p1SidJTeFSU0YUGK +3Y115L3/mD0CvP0BSuVPDW6IwJvfVypM7zH+iakGMTYJkw8bmJSpfezZZVc3vpTn7Lc Jv/jz1D1w1e9UGD/MWutPz5cvpzbPixQH8B3but4BHSwNL/Jzsqyw00sj4rzAL1lt2nv GkzIpSzYEAjZW6GMkCAblSy8R7jkJCcl1BHN4vj6lMz2Uub5MvdUgzGdjdeTZQ9sJhZm maAMAfWXILYu2VdCxRLdXtGp6SJsjo+UqLwlctucsLS/VHH+Fm40Qt1EXWgc/6lBgcf7 QOXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTNeBFd881jMaqMrWCJsjEEsOtPlpt88awm5NuIrqZoQubvy/HIaIntWZmvvgro1Q==
X-Received: by 10.194.92.68 with SMTP id ck4mr4539560wjb.144.1455755876542; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fatboy.intern (i577B59F2.versanet.de. [87.123.89.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z127sm353720wme.5.2016.02.17.16.37.50 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <8EB22CA3-9933-4193-84E1-BC4AAA4D1F62@gigix.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:37:47 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45382EC5-D365-49F4-BC3D-ACF68E25E4AE@gigix.net>
References: <20160218000429.12257.2783.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8EB22CA3-9933-4193-84E1-BC4AAA4D1F62@gigix.net>
To: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/SPd6wXuoxVYzGt4P6mGC07_GNjo>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:38:24 -0000

As a side note, RIPE NCC already implemented the registration service. They only wait for the two I-Ds to become RFC in order to start handing out prefixes.

ciao

L.

> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:26, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> HI Terry,
> 
> would be possible to have more information?
> 
> The latest email from IANA, dated 2nd February said:
> 
>> (BEGIN IANA COMMENTS)
>> 
>> IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:
>> 
>> IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. 
>> 
>> IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there is a single action which IANA must complete.
>> 
>> IANA understands that there is an operational requirement for an EID registration service that ensures uniqueness of EIDs according to the requirements described in Section 5 of the current document. Furthermore, there is an operational requirement for EID registration service that allows a lookup of the contact information of the entity that registered the EID.
>> 
>> IANA further understands that RIPE NCC has agreed to run both the registration service documented in this draft for the duration of the experiment.
>> 
>> IANA understands that this is the only action required to be completed upon approval of this document.
>> 
>> Note:  The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed.  
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Sabrina Tanamal
>> IANA Specialist
>> ICANN
>> 
>> (END IANA COMMENTS)
>> 
> 
> There is no question section in that mail.
> 
> Anything I am missing?
> 
> thanks 
> 
> Luigi
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: Discuss
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> This is a DISCUSS on behalf of the IANA who are questioning the clarity
>> of text and construction of the EID registry service.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>