Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-06.txt
Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABEB1A8AF9 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CEs7gHXjlEj for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECD21A8AE4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r10so1881419pdi.17 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=tYnpdjJmzFY0yYmmo5OzA/I/RIZTuJPaNTG5T3JJXoE=; b=R8alxHKucKiapBU3yNNh79EOVOV9GNldFqIFnGJkv7LFvpy6SUmiGyIHSnt395QLds jlkpx6aWK/ZG8BIjw9ujtMgt6TvPLUDghYFbggZhv+2JTjsblr6DS7cABrzL4wM0qsUS VJp7zQUYkpipSiUeIHUZ82+HDNivyf4sFxDGgJD+TtPLB9EcqfDxHBOcWpWhmC4Lbp3L pjh+j/+JoTAKZR1mtwLVP0WZGIw8/ZFrA+JxANIbJgxlxXly8Rfjcdgfvne/eivx6BiC Zl5/6HsMeny2X+lHMwBq5y6EbtKpvu5hosbWua2LPTKhNwmGmzu1fi4h6WuYKPe40mr7 hAYQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.231.69 with SMTP id te5mr6355145pbc.9.1414174326769; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.194] ([207.145.253.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xy3sm4415527pbb.38.2014.10.24.11.11.54 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47174596-C605-4086-8AC4-49B0A0AE8CF6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGE_QewesPLsgcU2NUYU4L_SvQD3g1ZBq=3tp3ty+wxHpasj0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:11:50 -0700
Message-Id: <F7EAF67C-F70D-4692-BE2E-53DA26686BD8@gmail.com>
References: <20141023163052.22949.14263.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E942AD46-12C5-4B99-BF6F-14346FD28380@gmail.com> <CAGE_QewesPLsgcU2NUYU4L_SvQD3g1ZBq=3tp3ty+wxHpasj0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/SRYpjmEASjIuBkeVHUs87Is2u6w
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-06.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:12:29 -0000
> Hi Dino > > Thanks for your review. I am attaching -07 + diff (not published yet) > where I have addressed all your comments, please let me know if you > agree and we´ll proceed to publish it. I just looked at the changes, they all look good. A couple of nits: Add period at end of this sentence. Typo in blue. >>> Map-Resolver: A network infrastructure component that interfaces >>> ITRs with the Mapping System by proxying queries and -in some >>> cases- responses. >> >> I would say "receive queries and sends negative replies". >> > > This is already explained in "Map-Reply", at this point Map-Reply has > not been introduced yet. I think that this way is clearer. Okay, fine. > >> But why don't you order the messages first and then refer to them when you define the Map-Server and Map-Resolver afterwards? > > There is a circular dependency, then I won't be able to use the terms > Map-Server/Map-Resolver when explaining what Map-Request/Map-Reply, > etc are. Right, understand. > [snip] > >> >>> Map-Request: This message is used by ITRs or Map-Resolvers to >>> resolve the mapping of a given EID. >> >> This message is also used by ETRs to request an ITR to do a Mapping System request. This message is also used by ITRs to probe the underlying path to an ETR. >> > > This is early in the document and I think that it is preferable to > keep things simple. The fact that SMR/RLOC probing functionalities use > a Map-Request type of message is not important when considering LISP's > big picture. SMR/RLOC probing are explained in section 4 with the > relevant context. Okay, agree. > Albert > <draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07.txt><draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07-from-6.diff.html> I vote for you to publish. Thanks. Dino
- [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introducti… Sharon Barkai
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introducti… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introducti… Albert Cabellos
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introducti… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-introducti… Albert Cabellos