From nobody Wed Mar 15 05:11:27 2023
Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D723C15152D;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id FWRPkPX18TEB; Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2f])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C117C14CE3F;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2f.google.com with SMTP id nv15so16175879qvb.7;
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678882283;
 h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version
 :from:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to; bh=GsYed2/97bYn6uLFmIxKQlIxPkOewf96wwALwdn+8io=;
 b=brRSUBa95kvR4ZtrkbCturfB6ALtxDJX8J/WtrjKWpv3GAYVwlKlvxPlxMfjUrQ5sp
 A/2gbaxhM9x3iTNROoFMw6/H6K3HoxuUmeE6Ej9t421y4rBFCAHLQsi1wxwCqBw1WY9m
 /83zG3u/1jzpegMGom4kqz/LlRRensj3T4IYCcCfKYyucHh6hwmOUHIuBrzFA1NJ5tsk
 S/ddilCrt7aKuA40uw66jIJ818NKzukysFrn9F4IQNKq7qbaXHBqYtieGSKAUrHTOhx3
 t8H86AOiqgFStHs7GLKauHdriuB4EO9LuBKe4OUeh6iiFHzL6YQhbnqbzK3HgthhdfK2
 VJ7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678882283;
 h=to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id:date:subject:mime-version
 :from:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=GsYed2/97bYn6uLFmIxKQlIxPkOewf96wwALwdn+8io=;
 b=XgRzghXFRRWRwubUTnsBj3zhlhX0R0tjflRvUqBFgPlytHuX4OW4hnyTiZAyyKNzct
 05FSDgCzKgxGUjzWPqEJx5PMgbaxSQOvgpYnFPHoIXiUTa6AwYccf7VNNtwPuShBonBT
 ficdaMkF4hCmgH2htH5uryj2OyALmmgw7aKKevxLu8YPQNY3CUi7qee9miJ3ygkONQro
 +7yc+7sMIOloKC1RXbVIccl5Aj+DBr2KGAKL42YpoOyA6AEdxtFj5urD7dta9hPdoi6D
 qSoyByTKsPQ2Zzne9IGJ50CGCVzpR5y5LhFS5s8gY/imBq797qF8McrgchPzCFmdebAt
 mMGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXd0PohrNFz8J6aUZiH62kM6gJ1WiexmkQzKyWrrVJCGaF1S31n
 te20KGRiKuTOLrzy/N4ZHh9++82SIW4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8i3KVVJHwKaORSeT8EDMWWua4q7hD9j2y2iRBRf0V+25xVU0a9NdMDuTHUy7EJphGfCzSZEw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d12:0:b0:3bf:da83:f8d6 with SMTP id
 g18-20020ac87d12000000b003bfda83f8d6mr72779121qtb.28.1678882283219; 
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([50.234.228.35])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 bs37-20020a05620a472500b00738e8e81dc9sm3655148qkb.75.2023.03.15.05.11.22
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 05:11:11 -0700
Message-Id: <09DC0539-EFAE-4DE5-8F34-0F0CBFBDAB29@gmail.com>
References: <38D80C3E-80B8-4F45-A70C-4298F2944EC6@gigix.net>
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>,
 "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <38D80C3E-80B8-4F45-A70C-4298F2944EC6@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20D67)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/UJsUC77ocjA49XCfsF_bd4NIImo>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Rechartering Thread 1: Promised work item: work items
 currently in the charter but not finished
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol
 <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>,
 <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>,
 <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 12:11:26 -0000


Hi Luigi, Dino

See below PPE

Thanks
Padma

> On Mar 15, 2023, at 02:03, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFHi Dino,
>=20
>>> On 14 Mar 2023, at 20:35, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> LISP Mobility: candidate document LISP-MN but does not solve everything s=
hould we enlarge the scope?
>>=20
>> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility as well.=20
>=20
> Right. We can have a general discussion about mobility and what kind of do=
cuments we need.
> Would lisp-mn and lisp-end-mobility be sufficient? Are there any other use=
 cases?=20

PPE- should we consider predictive rlocs draft as well? It covers predictive=
 mobility.

>>=20
>>> LISP Yang Model: We are pretty close to finish this one
>>> LISP NAT Traversal: we have a candidate document
>>=20
>> And VPNs are in charter and used quite a lot in LISP deployments, so draf=
t-ietf-lisp-vpn.
>=20
> Good point.
>=20
>>=20
>> Alternative Mapping System Design is part of the charter and the only dra=
ft that is pending is draft-farinacci-lisp-decent but not sure this needs to=
 be standardized.
>>=20
>> And we need to decide the outcome of draft-ietf-lisp-te and control-plane=
 security such as draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth and draft-ietf-eid-anonymity. I=
'm not sure they need to be standards track.=20
>>=20
>=20
> They can still be experimental if WG is willing to publishing them. The ch=
arter may include a security/privacy work item and these documents would be c=
overed.
>=20
> Ciao
>=20
> L.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> Dino
>>=20
>=20

