Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45A8126CB6; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxhmDkRDB0ZW; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FDD130DD1; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7854; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1532018923; x=1533228523; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=zTAW9nCgJ2n11MwlrBMjP3KdIyakGmeDmMI6y66n1ew=; b=D5QOd69c2XjM8nEL8m64/sgWotNvynQkM83fKb2kPN94IDiID90LHKaJ x6sBNg1ltqoZn7qMqg6fRIyCD8MojHW3lFvqjUbCTmKFE4xaDbiK4G39q AFO7SeNFcn+tzLHVTq1UcjTnTNiFXfPvXQp4nf7Gvg1gjuq/nOcAqJpMf Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CwAACzv1Bb/5pdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXdmN/KAqDdIgEjCyBaCSQK4UQFIFmCyOESQIXgm4hNBg?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU2AQEBAQMdBlYQAgEIDgMDAQIrAgICMB0IAgQBDQWDIAG?= =?us-ascii?q?BG2QPqT2BLoRdhWgFiQKBVz+BOAyCXoMZAQEDgSoBDwICAT6CYTGCJAKIVpE?= =?us-ascii?q?SCQKGC4kfgUSEEoZ/gReKP4c3AhEUgSQdOGFxcBU7KgGCPgmLDIU+b4pbgRo?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,375,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="145536588"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jul 2018 16:48:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6JGmgo6031896 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:48:42 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:48:41 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:48:41 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
Thread-Index: AQHUFRF4S8RPFhS3o0y8DEMd9j1t36SW51KA
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: <57143EB6-CDA5-4553-9410-5B43CC10D5E1@cisco.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.b.0.180311
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.61]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_57143EB6CDA5455394105B43CC10D5E1ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/UOEqGKnpdM4kDWItVn88HZSZS2k>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:48:46 -0000

I agree that this document is ready to be handed to the AD.

From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:09 AM
To: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Cc: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Folks,

As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).

Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.

Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

Thanks

Luigi & Joel