[lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-17: (with COMMENT)
Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 09 July 2020 12:43 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE463A09B3; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 05:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe@ietf.org, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, ggx@gigix.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <159429861569.12326.4735174452265776723@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 05:43:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Ul7s0MVbdSKC3HpYNDt9hBpTp1I>
Subject: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 12:43:36 -0000
Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 4.2: To me it looks like this is normative reference: Such new encapsulated payloads, when registered with LISP- GPE, MUST be accompanied by a set of guidelines derived from [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines] and [RFC6040]. Section 4.3.1: Thanks for writing relevant guidance on how to mitigate the risks with zero checksum. Especially the one on traffic separation from other traffic so that it can be caught on the boundaries of the network to prevent the risk to other networks from corrupted traffic.
- [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-… Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Fabio Maino (fmaino)
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Fabio Maino (fmaino)
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Fabio Maino (fmaino)
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Fabio Maino (fmaino)
- Re: [lisp] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on dr… Magnus Westerlund