Re: [lisp] WG LC draft-ietf-lisp-threats-12

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Wed, 15 April 2015 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6D1B32DE for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59mq5myW5bfo for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1C31B32DD for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so38206644wgy.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=y6/2k8wweW5X7d3NU9r3adAktxnux5ELWRC/IWf6KfU=; b=Am8Ao3y4KqJKEDYTNx/JI5eSsQjJrPQYYvJMYm/i9jel6oxwGMaaLwHu0RXao0P6RJ MYLi6wFKnvR4zlZi/JlGCc8E/vBnL+bDZoToJIrrcMxJwZfzn0rJbMHUzV9TwIStlJZR axkWBE1KnaeSZB7kzcrXZqy4Qplo9yvQcp+iwj4efcWbi/b5g+ORPR2STTJaPNd4PL9W EblzN8OS1NIoXfn6j/c45u5VKEwRthTrw+hRUpdiGrUlIOwJWL9tTbI3Xe/Jo+NXt1Sx nbU0OnaRdreOhgHIKO708t54YH8wGnPyuyGxo5O/aR05e7pI3YW0OVDz+qVSfUR1FCGV aRug==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqOiu1s5yBkIfqkOPtic3U+ZTP80ullH4th8cvZSv5YBWK+fEMnGU52SDTD0dOZIt7j6Xf
X-Received: by 10.180.8.98 with SMTP id q2mr38585684wia.80.1429085919723; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:660:330f:a4:81ee:a62f:1934:e0d7? ([2001:660:330f:a4:81ee:a62f:1934:e0d7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s4sm9660753wix.14.2015.04.15.01.18.38 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4CAF1732-C813-4DD0-A575-6BD45C296359"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <84BEB8D1-06A4-4925-AA20-0C0220B0C4B2@gigix.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:18:43 +0200
Message-Id: <CBBE5BC4-A24F-45CE-9591-9C38854F82E0@gigix.net>
References: <84BEB8D1-06A4-4925-AA20-0C0220B0C4B2@gigix.net>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/V1hi8xb9X2I-Ac2GrObtyMKCGS4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG LC draft-ietf-lisp-threats-12
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:18:43 -0000

Hi All,

the two weeks WG LC for the lisp threats document have elapsed.
No objection have been raised, hence, the WG LC consensus expressed during last meeting is confirmed.

The document will now move forward waiting the shepherd writeup and then into Ads hands.

ciao

Luigi


> On 31 Mar 2015, at 12:24, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> During 92nd IETF  LISP WG meeting the authors of the LISP Threats document
> [http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lisp-threats-12.txt <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lisp-threats-12.txt>] requested the Work Group Last Call.
> 
> There was rough consensus in the room for last call, hence, to confirm such outcome, 
> this email starts the two weeks WG Last Call, to end April 14th, 2015.
> 
> Please review this updated WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel