Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-03

Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> Fri, 12 December 2014 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E811A1A9C for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPcOvCfNZY9N for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AFED1A6FEF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,565,1413237600"; d="scan'208";a="93198164"
Received: from saehrimnir.inria.fr ([138.96.206.202]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 12 Dec 2014 18:32:45 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <D9D776FF-5F0A-4C36-988B-5ECB045CC596@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:32:44 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E0D747B6-9F03-4C86-ACE4-83B21A1ED49F@inria.fr>
References: <D9D776FF-5F0A-4C36-988B-5ECB045CC596@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/VihTxobnax0QRZkuoM2KBFniCIo
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-03
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:32:56 -0000

Hello,

I am ok with the last call for the EID Block Management Guidelines document.

Just a question, section 3.b  ("Prefix Size Rationale”) of the "EID Prefix Request” form
is mandatory, what information must be put there?

Damien Saucez


On 04 Dec 2014, at 14:33, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> After the final re-wording of the EID Block Management Guidelines document, 
> with the submission of the -03 version [http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-03.txt],
> the work seems done and no further issues are pending.
> During the 91st IETF meeting the authors requested to resume the WG Last Call.
> 
> This email starts a 14 day WG Last Call, to end December 19th, 2014.
> 
> Please review this updated WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp