IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

"Johnson Leong (joleong)" <joleong@cisco.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <joleong@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A444B126CB6; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmpYPPNeJa7W; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27C7130DD1; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=887; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1532018602; x=1533228202; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=A7h9lTJbVSe+weeEOj+defodgJ88nQsvMtwzRx/yUdk=; b=E6avL5O2FCUIYY9CW9tcU2j9RiJU9OkQuUj5LBS20KVYu2Xc8ierRMZZ +WudyFNcH/xr3ldla0uRDKkrrtK4qfHTcdxVmu+nAts8+OKdOD64CnqkA XTA13rc6pYtOOruxJRBk/HHoghZnHefdISf+b22cqFOdPeiV4DghCMeCN 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CvAAC/vlBb/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNNY38oCot4jCyCDJU7FIFmCxgLhEkCgwUhNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU2AQEBAQIBAQEbHTQLBQsCAQgOCh4QJwslAgQOBYMgAYF3CA+qaYRdhWgFiQKBVz+BOIJqgxkBAQOBKgEPAgIBHoMygiQCmWgJAoYLiR+BRIQShn+BF4o/hzcCERSBJB04YXFwFTsqAYI+ixWFPm+KW4EaAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,375,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="429346840"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jul 2018 16:43:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6JGhLMI032730 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:43:21 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:43:21 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-014.cisco.com ([173.37.102.24]) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com ([173.37.102.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:43:21 -0500
From: "Johnson Leong (joleong)" <joleong@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
CC: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
Thread-Index: AQHUFREBz3em/kQpYU+mFZNvaGnl0aSXKOGA
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:43:21 +0000
Message-ID: <AAE6E825-E800-4AAF-8E21-F92E7326A2D9@cisco.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.160.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <5B1BFF5E66F452438AB2CA5669DE6671@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.24, xch-aln-014.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/VlDPwibKHSG7jJ7erWswI1mYFK8>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:43:27 -0000

I support handing this document to the AD.

-Johnson

> On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).
> 
> Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.
> 
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email