IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Proposing "Encapsulation Format" LCAF type

Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com> Mon, 01 December 2014 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B991A1B4E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0yaDfFHwFToS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:40:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85DD31A1B47 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:40:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hl2so12814372igb.5 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 03:40:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=boCeo7v4UAeFn2f6HSl2WivcOCCup7Pw+3O3cHEFPqU=; b=NOyR0zNJkjpfwaDAgSBij/CRH/v56QPu1YGcqeCscBdf+prS7QUzHeR2xhmWromrze Smpef9omiXdTzWPYrUCyXphS9FYZ+g8tGyRsskQj13P3gKHT1X0u/SbA/osBXrJQ2DlF Fyaxr+MiuzRigj+/d7o0bfuVfNQc4sxklQuqh7wFoZw16j82H/SxTXdIVZQVmIvGD0gk 2mExCMQ2OXqjv9dXtFC9Vk6z92J1WpVynX0tFHDQc8NKphQhv+JD/0wqncvTp8iIG5h8 mOSBsHtHCshzJgbT2MxRlUudqZbW6O5LrrOZVuETpxFawzgTeB6FNpgDQdSwvHnantxD hgwA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.29.5 with SMTP id d5mr52256135iod.45.1417434028379; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 03:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.35.73 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:40:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8B6BA237-6365-42FB-8EC6-E9CC59A107BB@lispmob.org>
References: <BD206B2B-8788-4595-8349-18404BE0A592@gmail.com> <AA3EDE9A-F22B-4DB7-8414-003F0875E11B@gmail.com> <DA93E662-48DF-428A-87A9-F8D8EDB08A99@gigix.net> <8B6BA237-6365-42FB-8EC6-E9CC59A107BB@lispmob.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:40:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGE_Qez5TTGFGSnV4NHqPpd=wx=23HqCMHLFzh+y6YmP0Mz+ug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
To: "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fe4d2c14e5b0509261303"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/W-fHh5RHf_7XZ1UM2eKR4QY0Ho0
Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposing "Encapsulation Format" LCAF type
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: acabello@ac.upc.edu
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:40:31 -0000

Hi Luigi

> Is the WG OK to work on the proposed encoding and push the work on a more
general format to later times (i.e. after rechartering)?

I agree with the current format, existing data-planes are still a moving
target and it is hard to anticipate their requirements. Additionally some
requirements might result in multiple lookups.

Albert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email