Re: [lisp] [nvo3] OpenOverlayRouter released!

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117A1B2F0D; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrJPTJzws0Be; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A49A1B3961; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:23:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14110; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454682220; x=1455891820; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3N5JfGMezz+iYGDcjCjhaQjWo+M0R5uvg4iNDOcws+g=; b=PCZ2Yjinddmp5S219EvkngrjHzP+TJ9zC9NJh8FznZh/krIg+eutd/y9 C4D8XDBUpEc77BP1uuscp0HTxMJ8C08+lXGtZWKrWW2PZpBoBReLgUDeK RpTBR4Raoo7c8ODmSsuL8z4sjwbddFM1r0QAz7uOWmXFdSeTbmGKla4Qx c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CWBABTr7RW/4kNJK1egm5MUm0GhCmEL?= =?us-ascii?q?KEjjnR2DoFmFwEGgj+BWYFXAoEwOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQQEBAQIBAQEBASBLCwU?= =?us-ascii?q?LAgEIEQQBAQEnAwICJwsUCQgCBA4FDgsCh3gIDrB+jmcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQENCIIfg3OBbQiCQoQ4ASYJCIJCK4EPBZZ1AYJ9gWRqiASCJYxOjj0?= =?us-ascii?q?BDw8BQ4FMghhqAQEBiH18AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,400,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="68336784"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Feb 2016 14:23:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (xch-rtp-018.cisco.com [64.101.220.158]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u15ENdcC020772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:23:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:23:38 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:23:38 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] OpenOverlayRouter released!
Thread-Index: AQHRX2j0avRNDVouIEKwOnMGpfvWQZ8dSGwAgACOLwA=
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:23:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4E7E7ADA-2647-4B00-9968-36981056E8B1@cisco.com>
References: <CA+YHcKE78m0L2AsoDtXxXamgHBqSKS0bk9TV63gexMDoGSi2dw@mail.gmail.com> <DB3PR03MB0780DA2CE529B076DCBBD9379DD20@DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB3PR03MB0780DA2CE529B076DCBBD9379DD20@DB3PR03MB0780.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.150.54.100]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2B1ACA0-B6A0-45D5-8807-216672242AB5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/X5CrG7LEmSbfostw54C30TmElc8>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 10:14:37 -0800
Cc: SDN IRTF list <sdn@irtf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "nfvrg@irtf.org" <nfvrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [nvo3] OpenOverlayRouter released!
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:23:43 -0000

Sasha,

It seems to me to be extremely relevant and very proper, as we want more open source software connections with the IETF.
https://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/2014.11.13_DWard-IETF-91.pdf <https://www.ietf.org/meeting/91/2014.11.13_DWard-IETF-91.pdf>
https://www.internetsociety.org/publications/ietf-journal-march-2015/open-standards-open-source-open-loop <https://www.internetsociety.org/publications/ietf-journal-march-2015/open-standards-open-source-open-loop>

“Within the IETF, we face numerous issues around our own life cycle. […] What does the subject matter of popular, network-centric OSS projects imply might be missing at the IETF?”

“How to Make the IETF Relevant in this Environment

• Fix, change, or reinvent the liaison process because it will be critical to collaboration with OSS projects. In fact, don’t even use the liaison process as a model.
• Embrace Open Source projects.”

Thanks,

— Carlos.


> On Feb 5, 2016, at 12:54 AM, Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> wrote:
> 
> Is this a proper kind of  message on  IETF mailing lists?
> 
> 
> From: nvo3 <nvo3-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <arnatal@ac.upc.edu <mailto:arnatal@ac.upc.edu>>
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 6:26 PM
> To: lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org> list; nvo3@ietf.org <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>; SDN IRTF list; nfvrg@irtf.org <mailto:nfvrg@irtf.org>; sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
> Subject: [nvo3] OpenOverlayRouter released!
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We would like to announce the first release of OpenOverlayRouter (OOR - spelled "double-O-R"), an open-source project, under the Apache 2.0 License, to instantiate programmable overlays. OOR is edge-oriented and multiplatform (Android, Linux and OpenWRT) with the aim to offer a flexible and easy-to-deploy overlay infrastructure. OOR is based on the former LISPmob.org <http://lispmob.org/> code.
> 
> 
> * Who can use it *
> 
> OOR is intended for end-users looking for easy multihoming, companies with strong presence at the edge, startups interested in overlay solutions and researchers exploring new scenarios.
> 
> 
> * Supported protocols *
> 
> OOR is interoperable with OpenDaylight and supports several protocols for both the data and control plane. On the control plane, it supports NETCONF for provisioning and management and LISP for operational state exchange. On the data plane, it supports IPv4 and IPv6 overlays with LISP and VXLAN-GPE encapsulations. The roadmap includes L2 overlays, further encapsulations and support for SFC headers.
> 
> 
> * Code *
> 
> You can find all the details and get the code at:
> http://openoverlayrouter.org/ <http://webdefence.global.blackspider.com/urlwrap/?q=AXicJcqxDcJADABAS0zAIv95kQYqOmoooXIei7zk2JHjvMgejMQMzBMEV992A7cPwOsNYLw0qQuT1TBg4aziphyyDjCn9nQ5X3OT9mnXAjI9Ue5koWKRqXcqcqRcnJh-v3cfDzHqSKKVjHExnf371R4R_la7aigo&Z>
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> The OpenOverlayRouter team
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>