Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of LISP Anonymity [draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02.txt]

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rrahman@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B2131F00; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tS9yU-RJISzn; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2585D131EFC; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6711; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1501114503; x=1502324103; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FRBPQCR16pwDqTcO8udTFlqgH72nSjUIBGzk3X8YuBc=; b=Qi7UmbWlowtFTlnpZUYaTsmlBsa5rr94RKZfPFZEjT2WpTplaYCY9krj 6joNG72VjwowRZz/HacI17CjvWpgfvuIQbLco0keYE5FQdu8RW1QCyGCk DfT8PGezWPiXpemCIxAGmCwzuew3A5uLZ4eWve+03sxE2A2imOJ0ya2Zz 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CeAACyL3lZ/4UNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9rZIEUB44GkWOQW4UughIshRsCg08/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRgBAQEBAx1RCxACAQgOAwMBAiQEBzIUCQgCBAENBYlLZBCzC4tDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDKINNgWGDJIUThVQFkS6OLQKHTYxTggyFUIpelW8BHziBCncVSYUWHBmBTnaIJ4EOAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,417,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="278661449"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Jul 2017 00:15:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6R0F1QG027988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:15:01 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:15:00 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:15:00 -0500
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of LISP Anonymity [draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02.txt]
Thread-Index: AQHTBgClmK3PW6/ICUyI2qrQcA1l6qJm35KA
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:15:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D59EA8B8.2CCC91%rrahman@cisco.com>
References: <208FA3B2-77AC-4625-82D8-30F49538E399@gigix.net> <2E04C474-173E-478C-859D-05DFD2321C0E@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <2E04C474-173E-478C-859D-05DFD2321C0E@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.81.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D59EA8B82CCC91rrahmanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XE7qu0sLfmVFRcnkjrb-ireC67g>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of LISP Anonymity [draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:15:05 -0000

Support WG adoption of draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity

From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>>
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:16 AM
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
Cc: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of LISP Anonymity [draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02.txt]

The call ends August 10th 2017 !

Luigi


On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:

Hi All,

During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02.txt
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-eid-anonymity-02]
asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption.

This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome.
The call ends on  August 3rd 2017.

Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.

Recall that:

- This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to
  modify the document's content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid.
  Therefore, please don't oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.

- If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why,
  and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

- If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can
  begin a dialog about how best to address them.


Luigi and Joel