Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2FD130EE8; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76dTK455dmvJ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com (mail-pg1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4002F130EEE; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 85-v6so2448725pge.6; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PwPeSNM0cjCt7Vle+WXfNA3aIiMMUrm5EprD/YW3ed0=; b=k20NEIaChHCo+q25GtXdVkSyVeJhkZyma9dWyei7A/hsPyGxrcRssHAOj38XSy863t 03pZjEeyh9bMCSr8I0jKzLDeMUOVgFVqI3OO9j9GWgd+2VNkhmDGfMLD5t/XSbOiCE1k sWXuJ817+9WFur38heowHVODaY2bz8dEReRh7ne0nAazfTx/mWx582BFCcEIai1l7s4f Wxvkpc9vvDfUOnnOzxmwNM6zPE3soyPq+ham2eJnuH1NWmkNze4B0x7bAkl3Y4KVV6wm 6GiN7oFlsuG9rgomyG/raH6/Km+mJz39uU0GFSb8ABq6GhoCUgQt3Lwpu489P343gWA9 xNNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PwPeSNM0cjCt7Vle+WXfNA3aIiMMUrm5EprD/YW3ed0=; b=Ao5Hm+4+egGdhcXyiW5ykO1A5/KtUJs4qofoBroSySB2Q/uVS3BQDsMBEyOX7CR+Di otINwVcpoLeWKUicIdygYtdLbWS1bTnJrPPJTO3A1mkOvt/0dQiVtdlZdeE+5S6lJazy BgBgtdB5xBGBa5zGINCALwtmIb3uHJi9yeK96UKKfxFZuXuc+CQTcCttDFd0Q3EM1zH5 XYa/iDrmd2rIyRx1oK+7W7syES5hcwpcuug9bExADuFnIXyIkkIhHCPuqgW0+mPgvKwf J5j44s/nh5B5CuYHK4mVXfvw8+GvPFL7KBsb0APpdpEZiTgZihU/WnJ7Ra8v2pN0Rlkc B+9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojaw5Juvvm2cVinWtnK1Xnp+sr+LPxPX43vVFF2kuMGnVtlFA0a fEC5ZDkN+Pd/5pJ7ERUKJjQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63PkZgQgxIr9AJYP9FOzKaJ5x08fLBZuJHA1MvQEXDB6k6t7A3sfYsOz/vchMXmTMpcHluybQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:4799:: with SMTP id p25-v6mr12598253pfi.197.1538069244734; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.79.57] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g21-v6sm5955171pfe.41.2018.09.27.10.27.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <153802608641.21525.4981689568836441403.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:27:22 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis@ietf.org, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FD9C027-C60B-4552-A1CF-B98D490CDC53@gmail.com>
References: <153802608641.21525.4981689568836441403.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XIj_0uHCjaNuCUIUhllXveAAymY>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:27:27 -0000

> This should be an easy fix but I would like to see it fixed before publication.
> When talking about IPv6 packets being larger than L, the correct behavior
> should be to send an ICMPv6 message with Type 2 (Packet Too Big) instead of the
> Destination Unreachable (Type 1) message as specified in the text. The text *is
> correct* for IPv4 messages with the DF bit set where the Destination
> Unreachable (Type 3) is the right kind of message to send.

Consider this fixed in -21. We had this comment before and missed this one occurence. I will make it the same language to be consistent with section 7.2. Thanks.

Dino