[lisp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-09

Timothy Winters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 25 July 2024 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.81] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC80CC16940B; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.19.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172194497955.1065771.9992402463744873969@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:02:59 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: D4PYJHIBKWMZRUKYU36XZXGXHYKUQGFT
X-Message-ID-Hash: D4PYJHIBKWMZRUKYU36XZXGXHYKUQGFT
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Subject: [lisp] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-09
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XgHpIftyjJJ2r4Zd-1tdEwdCD0I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>

Reviewer: Timothy Winters
Review result: Ready

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received.

For more details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

Summary: This document specifies AFI=17 Distinguished Names for LISP.
It's well written document short document. There are no Internet area issues
with this document.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
OBJECTION.