Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 22 December 2014 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6A1A1A8A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ifWH-EWjTjD4 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800D21A1A88 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lf10so6212747pab.19 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VSxM1iRQugA60JSHF98vndGBi1g5iDvOWLcqBDLzIXA=; b=F8TT6jfY/x9DqVeaQuIAEafenDLYGITmqn3mlPZzPr8kOt5oM4WkM9WBe3LsiN2/YR WP6mta6UKIoBsgdIkpb41EZ7e3FsbL5VASZ5QhBHnhIIyMjmHZzvxep1+ll5hFw5PN8L JeaiFM6qRbFvzL1Tex3VOZPDAqUHVlcizJC/pBN7Tgvg+AoarnjLI2szxk1RmfMe1ZlD y3IYq7MdPfB03+/6vQQMvrowAG75RWq086UunUefK4GVqPs8ylClnCj+drWA4blSDwvV lKnDJX2XX6g810EdH+ogpS2V50jfbGZyb1Hp0lQHQTAg69xETjPj8KFNgNGpj19XpsuP nCtQ==
X-Received: by 10.70.41.134 with SMTP id f6mr36462816pdl.25.1419267070686; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.84] ([207.145.253.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fu1sm17616875pbb.91.2014.12.22.08.51.09 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:51:14 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <13346F57-8C24-4455-8501-EEE7DFD86AFB@gmail.com>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net> <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XnWgKl8k2yC6yfN47ZFT8Xh7yyU
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:51:13 -0000

I like option (1) and think the document should be adopted.

Dino

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to address the milestone.
> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to address the milestone.
> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to do this.
> 
> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what "different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us understand your opposition.
> If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.
> 
> Speak up, please.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>>  for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>> 
>> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>> 
>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>> 
>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
>> description of the impacts of LISP”.
>> 
>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
>> January 2015).
>> 
>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Luigi & Joel
>> 
>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>>> adoption.
>>> 
>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>>> meeting outcome.
>>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>> 
>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>>> approval or disapproval.
>>> 
>>> Recall that:
>>> 
>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>>> expected to
>>>  modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>>> content is solid.
>>>  Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>>> changes to its content.
>>> 
>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>>> your reasons why,
>>>  and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>> 
>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>>> and we can
>>>  begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>> Luigi and Joel
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp