IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] LISP does not involve separate namespaces

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 30 July 2009 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C6B3A6829 for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jeiQlzdDoJap for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830D43A63EB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id E73AD6BE5C4; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:34:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20090730133452.E73AD6BE5C4@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:34:52 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP does not involve separate namespaces
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:34:52 -0000

    > From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>

    > "RLOC" and "EID" are not, and never have been, separate namespaces.

Yes, that's why we don't need a translation service to map from one to
another. Got it.

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email