IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01

Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net> Thu, 02 April 2015 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rcallon@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF641A9147 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yji4oRqZKAqd for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0145.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC931A910E for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 07:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.152) by BY1PR0501MB1432.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.125.19; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:57:59 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.152]) by BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0125.002; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:57:58 +0000
From: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01
Thread-Index: AQHQWnSPQbPJi+hgVUqTeQIKhdZvrp00M8ZggAArMgCAAAJBgIAFE3wAgACADQA=
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:57:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BY1PR0501MB1430E1506EB94EDE250FE6A9A5F20@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B339BFE7-7E19-4AAA-8B2C-276402024C74@gigix.net> <BY1PR0501MB14304477BFF1F86BAFC810B3A5F50@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5518A89C.3090108@joelhalpern.com> <BY1PR0501MB14306D728BC2F0CAE037DE58A5F50@BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <5C76220B-7DC6-46B9-8C57-A30D977FA7C8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C76220B-7DC6-46B9-8C57-A30D977FA7C8@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1432;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR0501MB1432C85B63EB359EDB86D259A5F20@BY1PR0501MB1432.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(164054003)(76576001)(92566002)(74316001)(99286002)(62966003)(77156002)(230783001)(66066001)(2656002)(87936001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(33656002)(110136001)(102836002)(46102003)(86362001)(54356999)(76176999)(93886004)(50986999)(106116001)(122556002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1432; H:BY1PR0501MB1430.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1432; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1432;
x-forefront-prvs: 0534947130
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Apr 2015 14:57:58.4769 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1432
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/YaKB5VFiyaZ6L_dHsV7kxXqB8jU>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-impact@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-impact@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lisp-impact-01
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:58:07 -0000

> See [CCD12], this document provides a generic model that works for
> any desegregation assumption as long as the map-cache is implemented
> with LRU.
>
> Damien Saucez

I am at meetings all of this week (and of course last week was pretty busy for most of us). I have however pulled up a copy of this paper, and will read it through as soon as I get a chance. I will try to respond the first half of next week. 

Thanks, Ross

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email