Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon

Luigi Iannone <> Wed, 17 March 2021 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A09F3A0922 for <>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5Elfv2PMG4Z for <>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC0C3A0925 for <>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id g25so903707wmh.0 for <>; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+PFapykXfxd5Og+Fi/yp229/8264oCj7XIEU2KTjYt4=; b=YjuYZv6759G/5aA1Pd7QKs4SiDDyevCxQ2JzDkzKCnbT/5ae0dPGfB+Jtj18dUW51u YYyWN+9rJvxTFaDX4efe0XS/QCo6uwvjNtZhwNF8EwStXSwFWwlOXLow0quo5lz9FNJd VwvAvk8AN31Ttvb6+7hYCAISQjrjKIlVHHXlz4gUsgEXsUq6PI/SvkT5nVN9RytvIG0F la0aHEj2BWG++18izeQjFTubmp43El230eDqsN4x4bsPkRisoNZbtom911IQy+NoO+Gw 5jnU33qTBHL+BTsWDxg6GKEXWnyV25npWdvG40j2sa9JGy30XSWIbc0n/wbx7NxHPZDQ xq4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+PFapykXfxd5Og+Fi/yp229/8264oCj7XIEU2KTjYt4=; b=nmEPOkqQam6x8wpsXuEZ754e966xb3Jl/uF0iAKnmLFdeSOuWCDW3YjtllIltCx2RW +4WxTcVmDNod6O0Kx+VO5x9x+trH9lmWa1Q8dgaghUhiCYaUV/bZ2u9q3giteLCfsBB9 RPCxXnBvRvmTwp0bMGaeMwvfJUhzH3bHdk4Tj0nLn4u7GC7ZZKQ79Iwv1olxvHGS7lUa 2q6YlbLTTVJv5KNwlYne3/oojDO4jaFrN9ubu4wawdJlxcrILvmY86bJYyDpjMzADDAJ R23anGttljcMHvabnuW65ztiwGzddS0ooCZHobZIV6Si6iLMwgcJ/JV4xUMLSMkByChe EHRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mg8wwo6mA4/DYIMQx7l+ZGywwOI9HnZa93Xb4lNGswN4nyh1g Ei6YDm4CL6HIz5kyPhvdCXIw/MRz8FYeQg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz50yhmw6y30zfB0kyD53W5sMZjIuNElo9J54QwetHCjA+IUH7UOQSHmaeUhC24nCZ2idRX6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7ca:: with SMTP id z10mr2289508wmk.117.1615966811534; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:1ec:470:7116:6a89:f55a:b87a? ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:7116:6a89:f55a:b87a]) by with ESMTPSA id v2sm2131421wmj.1.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_16E3278E-1703-4578-8A1D-D70CC6321406"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:40:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <>
To: " list" <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:40:17 -0000


This WG Last call is now over and the chairs consider that there is sufficient support to move this document forward.

We are looking for some help and we would appreciate if someone would volunteer to shepherd this document.

Anybody interested?




> On 3 Feb 2021, at 16:25, Luigi Iannone <> wrote:
> Hi All,
> The authors of  draft-ietf-lisp-nexagon submitted the current version back in October solving issues raised during SECDIR review.
> No further comments have been raised and the authors consider the document stable and ready for  WG Last Call.
> This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end February 17th, 2021.
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready to be handed over to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> NOTE: silence IS NOT consensus!
> Thanks
> Luigi & Joel