IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] Re: Request LISP-Decent

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 28 June 2024 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48627C14F61D; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rflRqcZ-z9sq; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C256C14F5EC; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7066a4a611dso559135b3a.3; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719590088; x=1720194888; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fZ5gMUiwTv7089L06CbLT32cwogi+Hpk1Ao1YOmBTTo=; b=J6Jc3R48jZ/HSw/+nKhBJpoTEpQki+evqMedYji5ltQCQDgEbiq5Fs4+0R4OgYql6q E0EQ82c55cWb8KuBLMfdzaBcOoexjZUhUvE0Nm+83SqHTy1Vcgn6hpIauCfvGASOVpmO wSuOvYCk5kMFGFJX6iL1urNrZtwLdDncMnXfcnGPHB864v+sOfWsxlnJ3knHZTydorQo uJvr/hJQ9IHiLraapEvLTypjJ33s5ripQStWWZjP4SNW1GO79Gsz3dBLGw3iQrrWipjK CIN5GOKG7ax3bnRFeN56nCZ0yLcPsIMJj2j01s/mkCFpNevQVQXodTwyEcI/xrVfs00C 8sww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719590088; x=1720194888; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fZ5gMUiwTv7089L06CbLT32cwogi+Hpk1Ao1YOmBTTo=; b=TIxlx1vO2gHelle137qS1bSJRhDTIgU27e3Cv6cdy89A1+CNS2N+eMWDM45T0xzCI2 DWeWpyZqcG1cHKPXpZ/CPYcu6BnxJGS/NIqAp7CVa47XFJr7DEM06n0vFT8ycK2b+PHa bKlkLhbhy8PDAA3JaEVfMoue/SnHjOGJ9fmhnE4DkvLvT5CSDNAxBLHdsAHtu2cmkwXs r2vMpY5OQxQJNCbmsdS+80GM4yl9GqAnvGoNkiKBY+jw2mfkHaUww4z1xDU2CakFWrHD CSgm/sR12PRR4M4/Y5caRSCKnOTcUXxQ3kmCmpf9Cg8RgOxMgG8G051GXE6K+jiNBoX4 09Cw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXiZ4slZENsfFkIW9Pd3XIadzgylzoJbKCuK45v7k94aw65xRb4XfKUvzmUAZrCrJoNJcqb1Sm1RKoMyDhO
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzEatHeqQN8S00H6GGX7lVs31UdDTKijpVfo4ErhkjUY9MJEnyN rn9YfEk2HSPSke32ajclNavQp74HOBNQipq2terQPLrd93TOpdPE6eqQ0g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESnTzoTuABD3MM9xhe4XrJLqdUVl+mgNGmW8LavYq8b9xjqNDp1kEvn/l4TTsAl1E7JaCYIg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9790:b0:1b8:a226:9a8 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1bcf7e6f5damr15284679637.13.1719590087878; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:646:8f81:5980:1576:281c:6704:c810]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1face441a1dsm10059545ad.39.2024.06.28.08.54.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <826B5724-1EAE-4CF3-8A6A-35DFE46FF6F5@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:54:35 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7A1637D-07C5-4B13-8A2D-A85FC333F438@gmail.com>
References: <4D7E230B-E4CC-414C-87AB-984BB49B7A92@gmail.com> <826B5724-1EAE-4CF3-8A6A-35DFE46FF6F5@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Message-ID-Hash: FF3FS2423MZNOU575GOIK3J5OKLAZI27
X-Message-ID-Hash: FF3FS2423MZNOU575GOIK3J5OKLAZI27
X-MailFrom: farinacci@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [lisp] Re: Request LISP-Decent
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ZRHjGFqLk9hvyWCJFGio2VTCas4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>

Okay, I have asked the ISE for their opinion.

Dino

> On Jun 28, 2024, at 4:06 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino,
> 
> Jim, Padma and myself discussed about your request concerning lisp-decent.
> 
> It is our opinion that since the current charter does not support the work  and 
> because less than a year ago the WG did not show interest in the work [1]
> it is more appropriate if this document is submitted to the ISE stream.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
> 
> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/h36AtLQY_7zsz9Ytw-gafFaonU8/
>   
> 
>> On 18 Jun 2024, at 00:10, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Since multiple LISP mapping systems *was* in the charter, I would like to request this document to be a working group document:
>> 
>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>> 
>> This mapping system scales really well and is easier to configure and requires less multi-organizational coordination than LISP-DDT. I have implemented it and test scaled it to 1M mapping entries across a 10 map-server cluster size.
>> 
>> Are there any objections to making this a working group document?
>> 
>> Dino_______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-leave@ietf.org
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status