IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 04 July 2024 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BFFC16942A; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C2IvXorTlOiF; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF13C14CF1F; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fa9ecfb321so4806265ad.0; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720109451; x=1720714251; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mKYQ1QCfuLThMSQfXSykNCJUE+m4SZOKoiHF31tBjCo=; b=YcjBL9w6y2Mq0qJKJSxcsi7ozdI0/Ie2kvnEhOehVP7PpkCXhrZcmx+7FKuWZQw34S 4pkQF0NopI5KIVGCEgksXgQHEaQJQ4LXCtnEf2p0lipOiZc5PRYKJEhNoR6L32lMUU2P DyFDFM8Z8+knlqAp3PY7yer7u/aV9TzmKqxIV60oYFtlXhFVEXi5wcoyNQBVqmwKqDEL LTiJqNzR/R3qFnIh/2ad3SYy9KZX3MKaHCZ189uLlxA8+fmLBPxzApIN7dkdCLAcSppm yKpouKJVItU27DtK9mQE2m34++T+3XysXR5UJRmhRMfFMk67NhWVclJBpr7wz9AWI4Y4 gIbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720109451; x=1720714251; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mKYQ1QCfuLThMSQfXSykNCJUE+m4SZOKoiHF31tBjCo=; b=vCjN+Zz4ecCgoJo3yFpC85jysFAzm96UQDED8PQt3SxpU0ZZL5gXBPdrp/LurTfyvD qIS1PjLA29bL+ngcJeW8k3ca1OdhVEqakXeGxuA5XMDbINWwUAT9aOulOMWF2go7RwWU v/99ZkLa4qHjXD8li378Vtk0javH12VyiPnT9aTjEVuhVCEFUQpLaGq5GOt1VwL9N/Fw VMfV3X9U6+ouMApO/W9jAQlgtlaytgCKOD9gScpt/wVsl3q1M1qRnH8LD2j/dcJ2U7OA cSrQALGrum0enLR5aD9BX9PXwUU18ydtFmKW1En8GkEJZVMnQpaDfAUGUjxM68ilAgEp 63pA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWHY5on0vG7IXHMNgMXETK2D1v5VF3A+Ldaxq9vZC6uKdyZZqlekq7K1Za/IwjJWqstSW6jnFEZ45Kv5z6/0sDdhVTk06NXB6tIA/zr5E+OKmwSaUwfnZHBeWc5jPAfvRLybnGGf3ClmAPul5Yf9RbqSAIUTIM8lB1NQOxkIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx2SjTQW366dKqO06fZ6tFB5M3cR8k1/Bc4ZrE1tOWO+Opm+YAo gk4zqh6vZzpnC+qAxFWFPS5lxnbgU4oTizleNBg8H3/MtPYa33Pa
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEwheW5rrhwOSaJnOmnaIIzgHVGnm847AiylnmipchLWlwX/rf0mZED44KRUAQtQHP9pcBRtQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c102:b0:1f7:bcb:ce60 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1fb33edfd46mr15342575ad.53.1720109450760; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-5-184-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.184.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1fac1569051sm124501615ad.215.2024.07.04.09.10.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <172009849668.1186236.17394682250472200383@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:10:39 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E72D07EF-DE36-4A35-B040-A40025B21B3C@gmail.com>
References: <172009849668.1186236.17394682250472200383@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jounikor@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Message-ID-Hash: HWTRRFEAEBMMFFXARRDOQEHWQ3OU5NA2
X-Message-ID-Hash: HWTRRFEAEBMMFFXARRDOQEHWQ3OU5NA2
X-MailFrom: farinacci@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [lisp] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/_J2d2mucD80_zpWMISQl-BB6yZA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>

> Major issues: None

Thanks for your review Jouni.

> Minor issues:
> 1) Section 7 Security Considerations is a bit thin.. aren't there anything a
> rogue host could do?

Well, a rogue host can only register name mappings if it has the authentication keys for a given map-server. So its not the name encoding itself but how it is used. And we have plenty of text in RFC9301 on how to authenticate registering nodes, as well as using signatures to allow nodes to lookup such names.

> Nits/editorial comments:
> 1) Some acronyms (ETR and 'x'TR) are not expanded. Please expand on the first
> use. I assume xTR refers ITR and ETR. 2) line 280: s/eTR/ETR

They are standard LISP terms. It has been commented many times before that we should not repeat LISP terminology is all the addtional specs and refer to authoritative soruces from RFC9300 and RFC9301.

Dino

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status