IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Sun, 18 March 2018 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9442012AF84 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRfnbeOQ5lGw for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0867512AAB6 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id n3so11947372wmd.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W19U8cLe7DvYPeyxPf/0IqZPOdtPwnfm8WS35wbd7tA=; b=Uteq4goGvniu/Kxm8gnScx59XDd8rcTXsqHzotKnA7pV2VZka9ogceZ2hYCEBe2h6Q 4cUuRx2A/0uBB5gBm4qgu1JjwYYQZgUDxXGAHNCzeYFIEuy9CqlJ67dwQfaA5Ck9ENU4 eTyEUklT8BTecN4G/Yjx1nc0L7sxvzaGuo3LBrD6/H7hFPv4reAZBh03OIxrcxOLNm+r KDbx+riXONaGMPJuN9wljuvXRxgA30i/AecMCREQhMtmLhLQxr5m+aQRqvB141kltf7M g8/2V64DdpDTSoCGj+v0kNakDpP1gHxMJ6cUP2NQNkCRluXbIFOxoR3hCMUCnMQxcAgr SvRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=W19U8cLe7DvYPeyxPf/0IqZPOdtPwnfm8WS35wbd7tA=; b=QzM52nlZYCD3Rw9yK+By17yrWrFuFs7xldwuRGNM/zOEml+Ea/hUy35C97zvUXI7oW Dwik0n1oidl8cHUIbkwzNkle9HmWSJeHUVM/kZpccHkqrjwtF/EV7POG5eN44s0+UKfI 8AxeReZYt4uV1ELvWFSFfHTYtFbOiwtSh2wxkUTCNamEsM1Ygt9PTQP9RdzpbiEkdNAh 1lGlm7vrzUIZQYDvoYtIzccsd8hzloDi1XLPHGmB4DXO5ctXXvBB7PBin2ryK8EXWrsV NE4eok5uwfcgQLkOii/soAmHT3fnlo7YgK76dbMUzmVQEvwt3j+2vjtsLmE4cY9OFP/k 7LBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7GUhiGfl9VnbgO9BWNLFQH8bBP3Tkj799iWDych9v0QdX5VrES2 jXaG72mxwXZoLAYyRmd3jgteZP8M
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtNF8xRqpHLKyH+rx4BQ8f6e6tVjJlBha3EUKnpZAqz+wgrXy08l+WC8ltWUTLtSwbyqf3QKw==
X-Received: by 10.28.71.204 with SMTP id m73mr6478907wmi.111.1521405781341; Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:a199:5e27:6a92:e80e? ([2001:67c:1232:144:a199:5e27:6a92:e80e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 96sm12968650wrk.54.2018.03.18.13.42.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100)
In-Reply-To: <05052a56-f6fd-b218-3a06-c516b01a08a8@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:42:59 +0000
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <93CBA389-8182-436A-9946-D5BD8C9F721C@gmail.com>
References: <B6E99388-F4B4-4980-B1F7-3351B4889AB4@gigix.net> <7E37C3CA-3D38-40DC-9162-D2477F8B8412@gmail.com> <05052a56-f6fd-b218-3a06-c516b01a08a8@joelhalpern.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/aoHheCjOmEglHviBrhPNdddh5xY>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 20:43:04 -0000

I can’t defend the text. As an author it was only put in as a request. And I was coached by many on how it should read. 

Why wasn’t this caught earlier?

Dino

> On Mar 18, 2018, at 6:47 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> Assuming this 10.4 is now 7.3 and that we are disucssing the text in 4.1, as written the text does not make sense
> A new document can not specify a preferred value in a section in an existing document.
> 
> I am not sure what it is trying to say.  It mostly seems to be saying something that is IANA policy (can you request a specific code point from a registry).
> 
> As best I can tell, it should be removed.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 3/18/18 1:06 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> I’ve read 6833bis document.
>>> My few comments cab be found inline.
>> See comments inline. New draft enclosed with diff file. I’ll wait 6 hours to post to give you a chance to look it over.
> ...
>>>>    Values in the "Not Assigned" range can be assigned according to
>>>>    procedures in [RFC8126].  Documents that request for a new LISP
>>>>    packet type MAY indicate a preferred value in Section 10.4.
>>>> 
>>> Don’t understand the “in Section 10.4” part. Should be deleted.
>> This was added when we were writing draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana (RFC8113). It was a request from someone (not Mohammad) I think. Didn’t change.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status